Neural Priming Before Performance: Acute Effects of Neuroathletic Training-Integrated Resistance Training Versus Conventional Resistance Training on Sprint Acceleration, Jump Performance, Eccentric Hamstring Strength, Flexibility, and Bilateral Hamstring Symmetry in Collegiate Athletes
Neural Priming Before Performance: Acute Effects of Neuroathletic Training-Integrated Resistance Training Versus Conventional Resistance Training on Sprint Acceleration, Jump Performance, Eccentric Hamstring Strength, Flexibility, and Bilateral Hamstring Symmetry in Collegiate Athletes
This study investigated the acute and short-term effects of neuroathletic training (NAT)-integrated resistance training compared with conventional resistance training on physical and neuromuscular performance in collegiate athletes. Fifty-eight collegiate athletes completed two experimental resistance training sessions separated by one week. The conventional resistance training condition was performed first, followed one week later by a NAT-integrated resistance training condition.
Both sessions included the same lower-extremity resistance exercises, training volume, intensity, exercise order, and rest intervals. During the NAT-integrated condition, visual, vestibular, gaze-stabilization, and proprioceptive drills were incorporated before selected resistance sets and during rest intervals. Sprint acceleration, bilateral and unilateral jump performance, eccentric hamstring strength, bilateral hamstring maximum difference, and sit-and-reach flexibility were assessed before training, immediately after training, 15 minutes after training, and 30 minutes after training.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Neuroathletic training is an emerging training approach that incorporates visual, vestibular, proprioceptive, and sensorimotor exercises with the aim of improving the quality of sensory input and motor readiness. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether integrating brief neuroathletic training drills into a conventional lower-extremity resistance training session could influence acute and short-term physical performance responses in trained collegiate athletes.
The study used a non-randomized, fixed-order, within-participant repeated-measures intervention design. Fifty-eight collegiate athletes completed two experimental sessions separated by one week. During the first experimental session, participants completed conventional lower-extremity resistance training. During the second session, participants completed the same resistance training program combined with neuroathletic training drills. Therefore, each participant served as their own control.
The resistance training protocol consisted of leg press, Romanian deadlift, leg extension, seated leg curl, dumbbell step-up, and Copenhagen exercise. Training volume, intensity, exercise order, and rest intervals were matched between conditions. During the conventional condition, rest intervals consisted of passive rest. During the NAT-integrated condition, participants completed a 6-8-minute pre-session neuroathletic activation block followed by brief neuroathletic primers before selected resistance sets and during rest intervals. These drills included binocular and monocular convergence-divergence tasks, unilateral eye occlusion, gaze stabilization, vertical and horizontal vestibular stimulation, head-position variations, and proprioceptive awareness exercises.
Performance assessments were conducted before training (T0), immediately after training (T1), 15 minutes after training (T2), and 30 minutes after training (T3) during each experimental condition. Outcome measures included 5-meter sprint acceleration, bilateral countermovement jump performance, right- and left-leg unilateral jump performance, eccentric hamstring strength assessed using the IVMES H-Bord during the Nordic hamstring exercise, bilateral maximum difference between hamstring strength outputs, and sit-and-reach flexibility.