Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap Versus Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of the Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap (VCAF) and the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF), both combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD), for the treatment of Miller Class I gingival recession. Twenty-six Miller Class I gingival recession defects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the VCAF + CTG + EMD group or the CAF + CTG + EMD group. Clinical outcomes, including mean root coverage, complete root coverage, recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness, vestibular depth, and esthetic outcomes, will be assessed at baseline and throughout a 6-month follow-up period. Three-dimensional digital models obtained from an intraoral scanner will also be used to evaluate soft tissue changes following treatment. The study is designed to determine whether the VCAF technique provides superior clinical and esthetic outcomes compared with the conventional CAF technique.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Semilunar and Conventional Coronally Positioned Flap for the Treatment Gingival Recession
Evaluation of Root Coverage After the Use of Coronally Advanced Flap Either With Advanced Paltelet Rich Fibrin or Subepithilial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
Effectiveness of the Papillary Extended Connective Tissue Graft in Miller Class III Gingival Recession
Single Stage Root Coverage for Gingival Recession With or Without Free Gingival Graft