Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Management of Miller class I & II gingival recession using coronally advanced flap combined with conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft versus coronally advanced flap combined with abrasive de-epithelized connective tissue graft Null hypothesis: In patients with Miller class I and II gingival recession, there is no difference between coronally advanced flap with conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft and coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized connective tissue graft in recession depth reduction.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test group | Experimental | SCTG will be harvested from the palate in the intervention group (coronally advanced flap and abrasively de-epithelialized free gingival graft) |
|
| Control group | Active Comparator | SCTG will be harvested from the palate using Zucchilli's technique (zucchelli, 2010) in the control group (coronally advanced flap and conventionally de-epithelialized free gingival graft) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized graft. | Procedure | SCTG will be harvested from the palate by abrasive de-epithelialization of palatal graft involves removing the epithelium of the selected area with a high-speed hand piece and diamond bur |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Post-operative pain | Directly will be evaluated post-surgically with Visual Analogue Scale with numbers from 0 to 10 that given to the patients at 7 days follow-up visits. | 7 days |
| Indirect Post-operative pain | Indirectly will be evaluated on the basis of the mean consumption of analgesics | 7 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Root Coverage | CRC evaluated in patients by single operator clinically using a periodontal probe. Root coverage was deemed complete when the gingival margin is at or above the level of CEJ | 6 months |
| Recession depth. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005889 | Gingival Recession |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| coronally advanced flap with de-epithelized graft. | Procedure | SCTG will be harvested from the palate by abrasive de-epithelialization of palatal graft involves removing the epithelium of the selected area with a blade |
|
Measured from the CEJ to the most apical extension of the gingival margin
| 6 months |
| Gingival Recession Width | measured at the level of the CEJ. | 6 months |
| Width Of Keratinized Gingiva | Measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival line | 6 months |
| Root Coverage Esthetic Score | The RES system evaluates five variables 6 months following surgery | 6 months |
| Gingival thickness | It will be measured by penetrating the gingiva mid-buccally in the attached gingiva, half way between mucogingival junction and free gingival groove with the periodontal probe after giving local anesthesia to measure the thickness of gingival tissues. | 6 months |
| Surgical chair time | measured by Stop watch | at the time of surgery |
| D055093 |
| Periodontal Atrophy |