This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical performance of two types of three-dimensionally printed fixed retainers (Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium Grade 5) with the conventional multistranded stainless steel fixed retainer following orthodontic treatment. Thirty-six participants will be randomly allocated into three parallel groups with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The primary outcome is post-treatment stability assessed by Little's Irregularity Index and lower arch dimensions. Secondary outcomes include bond failure rate and periodontal parameters over a 12-month follow-up period.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
salma.daabis@pua.edu.eg+201066600270
Participants receive a conventional multistranded stainless steel fixed retainer bonded after orthodontic debonding.
Participants receive a customized 3D-printed cobalt-chromium fixed retainer bonded after orthodontic debonding
Participants receive a customized 3D-printed titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) fixed retainer bonded after orthodontic debonding.
ahmedshawkydent@yahoo.com+201002024437
Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer
Clinical Effectiveness of Cobalt Chromium CAD-CAM Designed Customized Lingual Retainer
CAD/CAM Fixed Retainers vs. Conventional Multistranded Fixed Retainers in Orthodontic Patients. Comparison of Stability, Retainer Failure Rate, Adverse Effects, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Comparison of 3D Printed Resin Fixed Mandibular Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer
Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers
The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL