Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cairo University | Other Identifier | Cairo University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Despite the growing diversity of materials used for mandibular fixed retainers, the evidence base remains inconclusive. In particular, conflicting findings have been reported regarding the bond failure of titanium retainers across different evaluation periods, including immediate and 12-month outcomes. Additionally, the emergence of 3D metal-printed retainers has not yet been matched by sufficient clinical evidence, with current data being limited and lacking long-term validation.
In recent years, CAD/CAM technology and 3D printing have introduced new possibilities in orthodontic practice, with expanding applications across various treatment modalities. Additive manufacturing, commonly known as 3D printing, enables the fabrication of objects through the sequential layering of material to produce precise three-dimensional structures. While orthodontists are already familiar with 3D-printed appliances such as clear aligners, the application of these technologies in fixed retention is still evolving. Recent studies have reported the fabrication of customized lingual retainers using CAD/CAM techniques, including nickel-titanium-milled retainers and zirconia bars designed for use as bonded mandibular fixed retainers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional fixed bonded retainer | Active Comparator |
| |
| Bar 3d printed metal fixed retainer | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bar 3d printed metal fixed retainer | Device | Participants will receive a custom-designed 3D-printed metal fixed retainer. The retainer is digitally designed using intraoral scans and fabricated using metal 3D printing technology to achieve a precise fit tailored to each patient. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bond failure | Bond failure will be assessed clinically by detecting any detachment of the retainer from the tooth surface (number of debonded teeth). | immediate (within 24 hours after bonding) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| chairside time | Time measurement will start from the beginning of acid etching of the teeth and end after completion of composite curing for all bonded teeth. The duration will be recorded in minutes using a digital stopwatch by an independent assessor using a digital stopwatch (minutes) | Periprocedural (during retainer bonding procedure on Day 1) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amany Eltantawy | Giza | Cairo University | Egypt |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010152 | Pair Bond |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012726 | Sexual Behavior, Animal |
| D003259 | Consummatory Behavior |
| D001522 | Behavior, Animal |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| conventional fixed retainer | Device | Participants will receive a conventional fixed bonded lingual retainer (canine-to-canine) fabricated using multistranded stainless steel wire and bonded using standard clinical procedures. |
|
| wire breakage | Every 3months for 12 months |
| plaque accumulation | Plaque accumulation will be assessed using the Silness-Löe Plaque Index, which scores plaque presence on the tooth surface adjacent to the fixed retainer. Each tooth will be scored on a scale from 0 to 3: 0: No plaque
Assessment will be performed by direct intraoral clinical examination using a dental mirror and probe by a calibrated examiner. The outcome will be reported as the mean plaque index score per patient at each time point. | Baseline (before retainer bonding) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months |
| posttreatment relapse | Post-treatment relapse will be assessed using Little's Irregularity Index, which measures the linear displacement of the anatomic contact points of the mandibular anterior teeth. Relapse will be calculated as the difference in Little's Irregularity Index between baseline (pre-retention) and 12 months follow-up. | Baseline (before retainer bonding) and at 12 months |