Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a 4-week self-help online mindfulness-based intervention on mental and physical well-being in comparison to the waitlist control group. This study can provide support to the utility of self-help online mindfulness-based intervention, which may advance our understanding of the causal pathways between mindfulness-based intervention and well-being and guide future research. It is hypothesized that participants in the experimental condition will show better mental well-being, physical well-being, and better improvement in mindfulness and related attributes compared with participants in the control condition.
Upon completing the screening and pre-evaluation questionnaire, participants will be randomly assigned to either mindfulness group or waitlist control group. They will complete three sets of questionnaires in total which will be administered before the intervention (pre-test assessment), right after the 4-week intervention (post-test assessment), and four weeks after the intervention (follow-up assessment), respectively. In the experimental group, participants in the mindfulness group will engage in a 4-week online mindfulness course. The self-help online mindfulness course includes education about mindfulness, guided meditations (e.g., mindful breathing, mindful eating, mindful walking, body scan, acceptance, choiceless awareness and disengaging from thoughts exercise), and guidance on using informal mindfulness skills in day-to-day life. Readings, audio and videos are included to explain the concept of mindfulness and overcome common difficulties associated with mindfulness practice. In the waitlist control group, participants are to refrain from access the online course until they finished the follow-up questionnaire. All participants will be able to access the materials in an online platform after they have completed the research.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness group | Experimental | Participants in the mindfulness group will be expected to complete a self-help online mindfulness-based intervention, delivered over a 4-week period via an e-learning mental health platform. They will be assessed at three different time points: (1) before the intervention (pre-test assessment), (2) right after the 4-week intervention (post-test assessment), and (3) four weeks after the intervention (follow-up assessment). |
|
| Waitlist control group | No Intervention | The participants in waitlist control group will be offered access to the online mindfulness course after the study has ended. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-help online mindfulness-based intervention | Other | This self-help online mindfulness-based intervention is comprised of four weekly modules on education about mindfulness, guided meditations (e.g., mindful breathing, mindful eating, mindful walking, body scan, acceptance, choiceless awareness and disengaging from thoughts exercise), and guidance on using informal mindfulness skills in day-to-day life. Readings, audio and videos are included to explain the concept of mindfulness and overcome common difficulties associated with mindfulness practice. Participants will be asked to meditate daily and complete a daily log on their mindfulness practice during this 8-week period. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness and discernment | Mindfulness and discernment will be assessed using the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale. Ten items capture participants' levels of mindfulness and fourteen items reflect participants' levels of discernment. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 6 (Always). | at baseline |
| Mindfulness and discernment | Mindfulness and discernment will be assessed using the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale. Ten items capture participants' levels of mindfulness and fourteen items reflect participants' levels of discernment. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 6 (Always). | 4th week |
| Mindfulness and discernment | Mindfulness and discernment will be assessed using the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale. Ten items capture participants' levels of mindfulness and fourteen items reflect participants' levels of discernment. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 6 (Always). | 8th week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Well-being | The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (Tennant et al, 2007). The WEMWBS is a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects of mental health. It is a 7-item measure, using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (Tennant et al, 2007) WEMWBS is a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects of mental health. It is a 7-item measure, using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Psychology | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31144205 | Background | Sun Y, Luk TT, Wang MP, Shen C, Ho SY, Viswanath K, Chan SSC, Lam TH. The reliability and validity of the Chinese Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale in the general population of Hong Kong. Qual Life Res. 2019 Oct;28(10):2813-2820. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02218-5. Epub 2019 May 29. | |
| 30508772 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| at baseline, 4th, and 8th week |
| Non-attachment | The Nonattachment Scale-Short Form (Chio, Lai, & Mak, 2018) was used to measure nonattachment. Participants rated the items from 1 (disagree strongly) to 6 (agree strongly). Excellent internal consistency was demonstrated in the previous studies. | at baseline, 4th, and 8th week |
| Psychological distress | Psychological distress will be measured by the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, which is a well-established measure on psychological distress that asks about a person's emotional state from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). | at baseline, 4th, and 8th week |
| Physical well-being | Visual Analogue Scale-Pain (VAS-P), Visual Analogue Scale-Energy (VAS-E), and Sleep disturbance subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Measure (MOS-Sleep) will be used to assess participants' physical well-being. Participants will rate items related to their subjective energy level , pain and sleep. | at baseline, 4th, and 8th week |
| Staples LG, Dear BF, Gandy M, Fogliati V, Fogliati R, Karin E, Nielssen O, Titov N. Psychometric properties and clinical utility of brief measures of depression, anxiety, and general distress: The PHQ-2, GAD-2, and K-6. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;56:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 22. |
| 36089936 | Background | Tsoi EWS, Tong ACY, Mak WWS. Nonattachment at Work on Well-being Among Working Adults in Hong Kong. Mindfulness (N Y). 2022;13(10):2461-2472. doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-01971-y. Epub 2022 Sep 5. |
| 1028884 | Background | Schneider D, Appleton L. A reason for visit classification system for ambulatory care. Med Rec News. 1976 Oct;47(5):59-66, 68. No abstract available. |
| 1233242 | Background | Joyce CR, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Aug 14;8(6):415-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00562315. |
| 4762224 | Background | Folstein MF, Luria R. Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. Psychol Med. 1973 Nov;3(4):479-86. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700054283. No abstract available. |
| 16910215 | Background | O'Connor PJ. Mental energy: Assessing the mood dimension. Nutr Rev. 2006 Jul;64(7 Pt 2):S7-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00256.x. |
| 20155561 | Background | Sahdra BK, Shaver PR, Brown KW. A scale to measure nonattachment: a Buddhist complement to Western research on attachment and adaptive functioning. J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):116-27. doi: 10.1080/00223890903425960. |