Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-center retrospective study carried out with a phone call follow-up to investigate women's decision not to return for criopreserved ovocytes use after cancer treatment. The study database includes all women who underwent fertility preservation cycles at a third-level university-affiliated center from January 2001 to December 2017.
Patients were asked a set of standardized questions whose purpose was to investigate their present health conditions, cancer treatment and any potential relapses, their family projects and sentimental status, any spontaneous conception, and why they had not yet returned for embryo transfer.
All data were recorded anonymously in our dataset.
All women who underwent oocyte cryopreservation cycles for oncological purposes from January 2001 to December 2017 at Fertility Center of Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milano), Italy, were contacted.
The survey's purpose was to investigate their present health conditions, cancer treatment and any potential relapses, their family projects and sentimental status, any spontaneous conception, and why they had not yet returned for oocytes use.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fertility preservation population | all women who underwent oocyte cryopreservation cycles for oncological purposes from January 2001 to December 2017 at Fertility Center of Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milano), Italy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow up survey | Other | phone call follow-up to investigate women's decision not to return for embryo transfer after cancer treatment. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| return rate | return rate of cancer patients who underwent fertility preservation | from January 2001 to December 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
The study database includes all women who underwent fertility preservation cycles at a third-level university-affiliated center
Not provided
Women with an oncological diagnosis who underwent ovarian stimulation and oocytes retrivial and cryopreservation for fertility preservation
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valentina Immediata | Milan | MI | 20141 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36561560 | Derived | Immediata V, Cirillo F, Baggiani A, Zanagnolo MF, Ronchetti C, Morenghi E, Cesana A, Specchia C, Levi-Setti PE. Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte's storing for fertility preservation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 6;13:1054123. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1054123. eCollection 2022. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007246 | Infertility |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided