Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In summary, the investigators want to investigate whether UTE sequences are capable to replace imaging techniques involving ionizing radiation for bone imaging in the future. This would improve patient care greatly and might reduce medical imaging associated cancer risk drastically from an epidemiological standpoint. This field of research can be considered cutting-edge. The investigators determine this study promising to provide substantial generalizable knowledge and hope that this study results will improve patient care worldwide considerably.
To date, definite depiction of anatomy or pathologies of bony structures requires ionizing radiation by using radiographs or computed tomography (CT) since conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that does not require ionizing radiation cannot depict bony structures well. Modern MR techniques, collectively referred to as ultrashort time to echo (UTE) sequences, have overcome this issue by acquiring the signal data much faster and therefore are able to acquire sufficient MR signal from bony structures. The investigators want to investigate if UTE sequences are capable to depict bony anatomy and pathology similar to imaging examination techniques involving ionizing radiation. Healthy adult and minor participants, as well as adult and minor participants, referred for a clinically indicated MRI involving the skeletal system will be included.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTE MRI | Other |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquiring of ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI sequences | Diagnostic Test | Modern MRI sequences (ultrashort echo time (UTE)) for a better depiction of bone anatomy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the accuracy of bone anatomy size dimensions measurements between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 1 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be: - size dimensions of the bony structures in three dimensions in millimeter | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the accuracy of cortical bone depiction between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 2 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be - clearly visibility of the cortical bone according to a scale 1-4 (1 = cortical bone not good visible; 4 = cortical bone good visible) | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the accuracy of cancellous bone depiction between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 3 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be - clearly visibility of the cancellous bone according to a scale 1-4 (1 = cancellous bone not good visible; 4 = cancellous bone good visible) | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the accuracy of calcification depiction between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 4 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be - clearly visibility of calcifications according to a scale 1-4 (1 = calcification not good visible; 4 = calcification good visible) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roman Guggenberger, MD, PD | Universitätsspital Zürich | Principal Investigator |
| Christian Kellenberger, MD | Kinderspital Zürich | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Zurich | Zurich | Switzerland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Bone anatomy will be compared between different imaging modalities
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the diagnostic performance for depiction of bony anatomy between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 5 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be: - diagnostic performance measurements for the depiction of bony anatomy (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the diagnostic confidence for depiction of bony anatomy between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 5 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be: - diagnostic confidence measurements for the depiction of bony anatomy (1-4, 1=anatomical bony structure certainly absent, 4= certainly present) | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the Signal-to-noise (SNR) measurements between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 6 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be: - Signal-to-noise (SNR) | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |
| Comparison of the Contrast-to-noise (CNR) measurements between regular MRI and UTE MRI | Outcome measure 7 will be to compare the bone anatomy as visible on the radiation-free UTE images with the reference standard (pre-existing radiographs or CT) during readouts performed by radiologists. The measurements for the primary endpoint will specifically be: - Contrast-to-noise (CNR) | There is no baseline and follow-up examination for this study. The outcome measure will be assessed on the same day after the MRI examination is finished. |