A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy
Open versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy (OLLEH) trial Multi-institutional, prospective and randomized trial in patients undergoing left sided hepatectomy through laparoscopic versus open procedure.
Primary endpoint: Functional recovery Secondary endpoint: Hospital duration, estimated blood loss, operation time, resection margin status, postoperative complication, mortality, liver function laboratory test, re-admission, quality of life, cosmesis, cost effectiveness
Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy is widely performed for the treatment of various hepatic neoplasms. Many studies have reported that laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy is safe and effective compared with open conventional left-sided hemihepatectomy. However, prospective study is rare and there is no randomized controlled trial.
The surgeons who are affiliated at a medical center in capital area of Korea launched the Open versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy (OLLEH) trial to verify the surgical outcome of laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy.
Laparoscopic surgery has benefits that less wound and less pain. The hypothesis of the study is 'The laparoscopic left-sided hemihepatectomy is better than open surgery from functional recovery.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient who underwent open or laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for benign or malignant neoplasm of the liver
Child-Pugh A without portal hypertension
Age 18 to 80
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status: 0 or 1
American society of anesthesiology class: I or II
Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
mmcleemed@gmail.com+82-31-920-1709
73872@ncc.re.kr+82-31-920-0745