Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario 1: Uninterrupted chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation (ETI) during pediatric manikin with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compression was performed using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, USA). |
|
| Scenario 2: Neutral position | Experimental | ETI performed in neutral mannikin head position |
|
| Scenario 3: Sniffing position | Experimental | ETI performed in sniffing mannikin head position |
|
| Scenario 4: Pharyngeal swelling | Experimental | ETI performed during mannikin pharyngeal swelling scenario |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Miller Laryngoscope | Device | Direct laryngoscopy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to intubation | time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success of intubation | effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations. | 1 month |
| POGO score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Szarpak | Contact | (+48)500186225 | lukasz.szarpak@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Szarpak | National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland | Principal Investigator |
| Andrzej Kurowski | National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Institute of Rescue Research and Education | Recruiting | Warsaw | Masovia | 03-122 | Poland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Scenario 5: Swollen tongue | Experimental | ETI performed during mannikin swollen tongue scenario |
|
| Scenario 6: Immobilized cervical spine | Experimental | ETI performed during mannikin immobilized cervical spine scenario |
|
| The Bonfils intubation fibrescope | Device | Optical laryngoscopy |
|
| The GlideScope Ranger | Device | Videolaryngoscopy |
|
| The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT) | Device | Blind intubation |
|
self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score |
| 1 month |
| VAS score | participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation. | 1 month |
| Cormack-Lehane grading | self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4) | 1 month |