Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of four intubation devices in a cardiopulmonary scenario with and without chest compressions with a standardized pediatric manikin model.
Emergency airway management during resuscitation is a critical skill in emergency medicine. According to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for resuscitation 2010 , endotracheal intubation (ETI) is considered the gold standard during resuscitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intubation without chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. |
|
| Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shikani Optical Stylet | Device | Optical intubation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to intubation | time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success of intubation | effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations. | 1 month |
| VAS score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Czyzewski | Contact | +48696457655 | czyzewski_lukasz@wp.pl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Szarpak | National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Institute of Rescue Research and Education | Recruiting | Warsaw | Masovia | 03-122 | Poland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Endoeye Flexible Intubation (LF-V) | Device | endoscopy intubation |
|
participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation. |
| 1 month |