Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Dietary fiber consumption may contribute to weight regulation by improving satiety. In an earlier study the investigators found that a muffin containing resistant starch was more effective than other fibers in altering satiety. The objective of this study is to determine if 2 resistant starches consumed in muffins alter satiety and whether a mixture of resistant starches is more effective than either alone in enhancing satiety.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Dextrin Control |
|
| Hi-maize resistant starch 9g | Experimental | Hi-maize resistant starch 9g |
|
| Novalose 330 resistant starch 9g | Experimental | Novalose 330 resistant starch 9g |
|
| 4.5g Hi-maize and 4.5g Novalose 330 | Experimental | 4.5g Hi-maize and 4.5g Novalose 330 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo- Fiber free control | Dietary Supplement | Dextrin control administered in a muffin treatment. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Satiety response using visual analogue scales | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 0 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 15 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 30 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 45 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 60 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ad libitum food intake | 240 minutes postprandially and over 24 hours | |
| Breath hydrogen response | 0, 240 minutes | |
| Gastrointestinal tolerance using visual analogue scales (VAS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joanne L Slavin, PhD | University of Minnesota | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | Saint Paul | Minnesota | 55108 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Hi-maize resistant starch 9g | Dietary Supplement | 9g Hi-maize resistant starch administered in a muffin treatment. |
|
| Novalose 330 resistant starch 9g | Dietary Supplement | 9g Novalose 330 resistant starch administered in a muffin treatment. |
|
| 4.5g Hi-maize resistant starch and 4.5g Novalose 330 | Dietary Supplement | 4.5g Hi-maize and 4.5g Novalose 330 in a muffin treatment. |
|
| 90 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 120 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 180 minutes postprandially |
| Satiety response using VAS | Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS). | 240 minutes postprandially |
Subjective ratings of bloating, stool consistency, and flatulence on VAS. A stool count was also recorded. |
| 24 hours |