CompletedInterventionalNot ApplicableLast updated Aug 14, 2026

Comparison of Three Final Impression Techniques for Severely Resorbed Mandibular Ridges

Digital Evaluation of the Accuracy of Final Impressions Recorded by Three Different Techniques for Severely Resorbed Complete Mandibular Ridges: An In Vivo Crossover Study

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07764640
Lead Sponsor: Tanta UniversityOTHER
Brief Summary: This in vivo crossover study aims to compare the accuracy of three different final impression techniques for severely resorbed mandibular ridges in completely edentulous patients. The accuracy of the impressions will be evaluated digitally using three-dimensional scanning and deviation analysis to determine differences among the impression techniques.
Study Type

Status

Overall Status: Completed
Start Date: Dec 12, 2024Actual
Primary Completion Date: May 23, 2025Actual
Completion Date: Jun 14, 2026Actual

Study Record Dates

First Submitted: Aug 10, 2026
First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Aug 12, 2026
First Posted: Aug 14, 2026Actual
Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Aug 12, 2026
Last Update Posted: Aug 14, 2026Actual
Last Verified: Aug 2026

NCT07037407Completed

Intraoral Scan Versus Conventional Impression in Edentulous Patients With Flabby Ridges

NCT07108322Completed

Digital Versus Conventional Impression in Edentulous Patients With Flabby Ridge.

NCT06067334Completed

Complete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained Restoration

NCT05895292Completed

Conventional Versus Neutral-Zone CAD/CAM Dentures Restoring Mandibular Resorbed Ridges

NCT07377890Recruiting

Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Denture Impressions: An In Vivo Study

NCT05912725Completed

Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis