Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In vivo prospective clinical study will be designed, 12 participants will be included. After intraoral scanning, a conventional impression is made for each patient. The groups will be compared for accuracy.
Recruit 12 eligible edentulous patients
Scanning Process: Perform five intraoral scans (IOS) of the maxillary flabby ridges for each patient.
. WTI: perform five WTI for each patient
STL Export: Export scans and corresponding cast scans obtained via the Window Technique Impression (WTI) as STL files using the intraoral scanner software.
3D Distance Measurement: Import IOS and cast STL files into Geomagic Wrap 2017 for a two-phase best-fit alignment, using the Cast scan as the reference for evaluating trueness and precision.
Comparison of Scans:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTI | Active Comparator | Control: Window technique for Maxillary flabby ridge using two consistencies of PVS impression material then poured to obtain a stone model which will be scanned using a laboratory extra oral scan to convert it into an STL file (WTI) |
|
| IOS | Experimental | intra oral scanning of flabby ridge |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOS | Procedure | Intra oral scanning |
| |
| WTI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| accuracy evaluation | Accuracy Evaluation: The accuracy of the digital impressions versus conventional impression based on trueness and precision will be evaluated. - Trueness: Trueness is the degree of agreement between the digital impression and the reference scan. To assess trueness, we will measure the deviation between the reference and scanned files. Precision: Precision is a statistical measure that quantifies the level of similarity between repeated samples within the same group. In the context of this study, the IOS impression STL files will be compared to each other in a manner similar to the previous comparisons | 1 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:Inclusion criteria for participant selection will be as follows: 1. completely edentulous patients with maxillary flabby ridge; 2. Absence of infectious diseases; 3. Systemic good health (ASA-1/ASA-2). .; 4. Age between 50 and 75 years; 5. Willingness to cooperate throughout the data collection process.
Exclusion Criteria:Exclusion criteria included: 1. Presence of any remaining teeth; 2. Inability to comprehend the study's objectives and procedures; 3. ridge defect or lesion; 4. Postoperative scarring on the ridge; 5. Limitations in mouth opening.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October University for Modern Sciences and Arts | Giza | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
window technique Impression |
|