Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
aim: to compare the accuracy of the conventional and digital impression when will be performed on implant level or abutment level in Complete digital workflow for construction of full arch implant supported screw-retained restoration.
The patient will be selected according to the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria include:
Local or general contraindications for surgical procedures.
Patients with TMJ disorders or poor neuromuscular coordination or parafunctional habits.
Severe inter-maxillary skeletal discrepancy or limited inter-arch space.
Heavy smokers.
Accuracy will be evaluated as follows:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional (Open tray impression technique) | Active Comparator | After osseointegration, a conventional open tray splinted impression technique will be made for each patient on the implant/abutment level. |
|
| Digital impression | Active Comparator | Scan bodies implant level/abutment level will be tightened for each patient, and a digital intraoral scanner will be used to scan the scan bodies for making implant level/abutment level digital impressions. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| full arch implant supported screw retained restoration with conventional impression technique | Other | surgical procedures: Implant installation Prosthetic procedures: Conventional impression fabrication of full arch implant supported screw-retained restoration evaluation: Accuracy, Passive fit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit alignment to calculate 3D deviation of each impression | 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X) using the best-fit alignment algorithm will be utilized to calculate the 3D deviation of each impression using the root mean square (RMS) error. | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Passive fit | Passive fit of framework will be evaluated at time of insertion (Sheffield test) | 3 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Gamal, MD | Mansoura university, faculty of dentistry | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of dentistry, mansoura university | Al Mansurah | Dakahlia Governorate | 35511 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| full arch implant supported screw retained restoration with conventional digital technique | Other | surgical procedures: Implant installation Prosthetic procedures: Digital impression fabrication of full arch implant-supported screw-retained restoration evaluation: Accuracy, Passive fit |
|