Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Implant patients who applied to Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University provided anamnesis. The study included 165 people with 272 implants. The study includes implants that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Plaque index (PI) [13], gingival index (GI) [14], bleeding on probing (BOP) [15], periodontal pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), GP, GT, and KTW were all assessed in every implant patient. The presence of peri-implant mucositis or peri-implant health was assessed using the collected indices and radiographs. The patients were split into two groups: those with peri-implant mucositis (136 implants) and those with peri-implant health (136 implants). We investigated the relationships between each parameter and periodontal health.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peri-implant mucositis | In the absence of bone loss, peri-implant mucositis refers to inflammation of the mucosa surrounding endosseous tissue |
| |
| Periodontal health | Peri-implant health is characterized by the absence of erythema, bleeding on probing, swelling, and suppuration, and is synonymous with implant success |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implant | Other | The classification of peri-implant diseases is based on clinical and radiographic criteria, distinguishing between peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis according to the presence of inflammation and bone loss. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gingival phenotype | If the probe was visible when placed in the sulcus, gingiva was classified as thin (≤1 mm), and if the reflection of the probe was not visible, it was classified as thick (> 1 mm). | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Periodontal pocket depth | The periodontal pocket depth is the measurement of the distance between the gingival margin and the most coronal region of the junctional epithelium. | Baseline |
| Bleeding on probing |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients who have received implants
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| TUGBA SAHIN | Abant Izzet Baysal University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University | Bolu | Turkey | 14300 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004343 | Drug Implants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003692 | Delayed-Action Preparations |
| D004304 | Dosage Forms |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The bleeding on probing index was established as the occurrence of bleeding in the sulcus, thirty seconds after measuring the depth of the periodontal pockets in all dental implant.
| Baseline |
| Plaque index | An index for estimating the status of oral hygiene by measuring dental plaque that occurs in the areas adjacent to the gingival margin. 0 is minimum and 3 is maximum. The situation worsens as the score increases. | Baseline |
| Gingival index | The Gingival Index (GI) scores each site on a 0 to 3 scale, with 0 being normal and 3 being severe inflammation characterized by edema, redness, swelling, and spontaneous bleeding. 0 is minimum and 3 is maximum. | Baseline |
| Clinical attachment level | The peri-implant clinical attachment level is determined by measuring the distance from the implant margin to the base of the mucosal sulcus using a Williams periodontal probe. | Baseline |
| Gingival recession | Gingival recession is the measured distance between the enamel-cementum and the gingival margin. Assessment was performed using a Williams periodontal probe. | Baseline |
| Gingival thickness | GT was measured by inserting a number eight canal file from the buccal side of the implant until it reached the alveolar bone and then securing it with a stopper to determine the distance. | Baseline |
| Keratinized tissue width | The width of the keratinized gingiva was measured via a periodontal probe from the mucogingival margin to the gingival margin. | Baseline |