Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, it will be investigated if the phenomenon of offset analgesia, usually associated with painful heat stimulation, could also be induced using cold painful temperatures.
After filling some questionnaires, two areas (4x4 cm, 4 cm apart) will be selected on each forearm of the subjects. The areas will be randomly treated with one of the following trials: hot experimental trial, hot control trial, cold experimental trial, and cold control trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| off-set analgesia | Experimental | The tests of off-set analgesia will be performed using a TSA2 (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device. Two protocols will be applied: heat off-set analgesia and cold off-set analgesia. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat off-set analgesia | Other | The tests of off-set analgesia will be performed using a TSA2 (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measuring pain by computerized Visual Analog Scale Scoring | We will ask the subjects to rate the sensation of pain on a 100 | Immediately after the intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). | The PCS assesses negative and exaggerated coping concerning anticipated or experienced painful stimuli. Thirteen items have to be answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time). | Baseline |
| Learned Helplessness Scale (LHS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Lo Vecchio, PhD | Contact | 21397785 | 0045 | slv@hst.aau.dk |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249 9260 Gistrup, Denmark | Aalborg | Aalborg | 9620 | Denmark |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Cold off-set analgesia | Other | The tests of off-set analgesia will be performed using a TSA2 (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device. |
|
The questionnaire consists of 20 items, and the participant's response to each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale branging from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (4). |
| Baseline |
| Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21) | The questionnaire measures the magnitude of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of these three subscales consists of 7 questions answered using a 0-3 Likert scale, with 0 meaning "it did not apply to me", and 3 meaning "it applied to me very much" | Baseline |
| Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory - Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ). | The RST-PQ contains in total 65 items must be answered on a Response scale: 4-point Likert (Strongly disagree → Strongly agree). | Baseline |
| Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) | Twenty words are associated with the subject's current feelings and have to be rated on a 5-points Likert-type scale from: Very slightly or not at all to extremely. | Baseline |
| Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) | The questionnaire is an 18-item measure used to identify emotional regulation issues in adults. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 to 5). | Baseline |
| Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) | This questionnaire is designed to assess individual differences in the habitual use of two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Respondents answer each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), where 4 means (neutral). | Baseline |