Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Title of Study:
The Effect of Different Vasoconstrictive Agents on Hemodynamics Among Patients Undergoing Simple Mandibular Exodontia: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Location:
King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital (KAUFD), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia What Is This Study About?
This study examines two types of vasoconstrictive agents used alongside local anesthetic during simple lower tooth extractions:
What are vasoconstrictors? Vasoconstrictors help control bleeding and extend the numbing effect during dental procedures. They are usually added to local anesthetics (numbing agent) during dental procedures. This research aims to answer the following questions:
Who Can participate?
Potential Risks and Discomforts
Like any medical procedure, there are some potential risks, including:
From the anesthesia and vasoconstrictors:
From the tooth extraction itself:
Potential Benefits
Costs There are no additional costs to participate in this research. Treatment and extraction are provided free of charge.
Compensation / Treatment for Injury
If a participant is injured as a result of being in this study:
Confidentiality Participants' identity and medical information will be kept confidential. Only authorized researchers and relevant oversight bodies may access Participants' medical/dental records for monitoring or auditing purposes, in accordance with laws and regulations. Any published results will not identify the participants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epinephrine Group (1:100,000) | Active Comparator | Participants in this group received local anesthesia consisting of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 (0.01 mg/mL) epinephrine prior to simple mandibular tooth extraction. This arm served as the comparator for evaluating hemodynamic changes and pain control. |
|
| Epinephrine Bitartrate Group (1:55,000) | Experimental | Participants in this group received local anesthesia consisting of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:55,000 (0.018 mg/mL) epinephrine bitartrate prior to simple mandibular tooth extraction. This arm was evaluated for its effects on hemodynamic parameters and pain perception compared to standard epinephrine. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% Mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine | Drug | A standard vasoconstrictor-containing local anesthetic used in dental procedures to minimize bleeding and prolong anesthetic effect. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure | To compare changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the two groups (epinephrine vs. epinephrine bitartrate) at three time points: before administration of local anesthesia, 3 minutes after administration (intraoperative), and postoperatively following simple mandibular tooth extraction. | Measured preoperatively, 3 minutes post-anesthesia (intraoperative), and immediately after the procedure (postoperative). |
| Change in Heart Rate | To evaluate changes in heart rate between the two intervention groups across the same three time points to assess the hemodynamic impact of the vasoconstrictors used. | Measured preoperatively, 3 minutes post-anesthesia (intraoperative), and immediately after the procedure (postoperative). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Score Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | To compare pain perception during and after the dental procedure between the two groups using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients reported pain at 30-minute intervals throughout the procedure and at the end of treatment. The minimum value on the VAS is 0 and the maximum is 10. | Assessed every 30 minutes during the procedure and once at the completion of the extraction. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Razan M Baabdullah, BDS, MS, FRCDC | King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry | Jeddah | Mecca Region | Saudi Arabia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28538371 | Result | Karm MH, Park FD, Kang M, Kim HJ, Kang JW, Kim S, Kim YD, Kim CH, Seo KS, Kwon KH, Kim CH, Lee JW, Hong SW, Lim MH, Nam SK, Cho JM. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6753. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006753. | |
| 34759690 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 2, 2025 |
Not provided
This study used a triple-blind, parallel assignment randomized controlled trial design. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and the other received 2% mepivacaine with 1:55,000 epinephrine bitartrate. Both groups underwent simple mandibular tooth extraction, and their hemodynamic responses and pain levels were assessed at standardized intervals. The study maintained blinding across patients, care providers, and outcome assessors to minimize bias.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 2% Mepivacaine with 1:55,000 Epinephrine Bitartrate | Drug | An alternative formulation of vasoconstrictor-containing local anesthetic evaluated for its safety and analgesic effectiveness in dental extractions. |
|
| Result |
| Gupte SH, Kalra RD, Dcruz TM, Kamble S, Patnaik RS. Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Clonidine Hydrochloride versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline Bitartrate as Local Anesthetic for Adult Patients Undergoing Surgical Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):308-312. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_665_20. Epub 2021 Sep 21. |
| 26535092 | Result | Abu-Mostafa N, Al-Showaikhat F, Al-Shubbar F, Al-Zawad K, Al-Zawad F. Hemodynamic changes following injection of local anesthetics with different concentrations of epinephrine during simple tooth extraction: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Oct 1;7(4):e471-6. doi: 10.4317/jced.52321. eCollection 2015 Oct. |
| 17589623 | Result | Conrado VC, de Andrade J, de Angelis GA, de Andrade AC, Timerman L, Andrade MM, Moreira DR, Sousa AG, Sousa JE, Piegas LS. Cardiovascular effects of local anesthesia with vasoconstrictor during dental extraction in coronary patients. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007 May;88(5):507-13. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2007000500002. English, Portuguese. |
| 33575000 | Result | Silvestre FJ, Martinez-Herrera M, Garcia-Lopez B, Silvestre-Rangil J. Influence of anxiety and anesthetic vasoconstrictors upon hemodynamic parameters during dental procedures in controlled hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Feb 1;13(2):e156-e164. doi: 10.4317/jced.57232. eCollection 2021 Feb. |
| 34391560 | Result | Seminario-Amez M, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Ayuso-Montero R, Jane-Salas E, Lopez-Lopez J. USE OF LOCAL ANESTHETICS WITH A VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT DURING DENTAL TREATMENT IN HYPERTENSIVE AND CORONARY DISEASE PATIENTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021 Jun;21(2):101569. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101569. Epub 2021 Apr 10. |
| 20835569 | Result | Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400006. |
| 8891747 | Result | Tsuchihashi T, Takata Y, Kurokawa H, Miura K, Maruoka Y, Kajiyama M, Fujishima M. Blood pressure response during dental surgery. Hypertens Res. 1996 Sep;19(3):189-94. doi: 10.1291/hypres.19.189. |
| 21196862 | Result | Silvestre FJ, Salvador-Martinez I, Bautista D, Silvestre-Rangil J. Clinical study of hemodynamic changes during extraction in controlled hypertensive patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May 1;16(3):e354-8. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e354. |
| Result | Abhijith George, Mandeep Sharma, Prasanna Kumar, Sneha Kulkarni, Vinay Patil y Jacob John Plackal. Hemodynamic changes during exodontia in hypertensive and normotensive patients following injection of local anesthetics with and without epinephrine: a prospective comparative study. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac. 2022;44(1):9-15. |
| 21809720 | Result | Ogunlewe MO, James O, Ajuluchukwu JN, Ladeinde AL, Adeyemo WL, Gbotolorun OM. Evaluation of haemodynamic changes in hypertensive patients during tooth extraction under local anaesthesia. West Indian Med J. 2011 Jan;60(1):91-5. |
| 9832183 | Result | Matsumura K, Miura K, Takata Y, Kurokawa H, Kajiyama M, Abe I, Fujishima M. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate variability during dental surgery. Am J Hypertens. 1998 Nov;11(11 Pt 1):1376-80. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00157-5. |
| Jun 2, 2025 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008619 | Mepivacaine |
| D004837 | Epinephrine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010880 | Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D004983 | Ethanolamines |
| D000605 | Amino Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D015306 | Biogenic Monoamines |
| D001679 | Biogenic Amines |
| D002395 | Catecholamines |
| D002396 | Catechols |
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
Not provided
Not provided