Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The utilization of minimally invasive techniques has brought about a transformative shift in the approach to face rejuvenation, potentially representing one of the most notable advancements in facial plastic surgery in recent times. Originally employed to address the presence of fine lines and wrinkles, the application of fillers has now evolved to encompass the remediation of volume depletion and the enhancement of the aging visage.
KOS® L in the dermis regulates water balance, osmotic pressure and ion flow and functions as a sieve, excluding certain molecules, enhancing the extracellular domain of cell surfaces and stabilizes skin structures by electrostatic interactions.
The Research Question of the present study is the following: to collect sufficient clinical data to demonstrate compliance with the General Safety and Performance Requirements of KOS® L when used as intended.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOS® L | Other | An open, non-comparative, interventional single-armed clinical trial. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOS® L | Device | Delivery of medical device as injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of subjects with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the WSRS | Proportion of subjects with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) at month 6 after the last treatment (response rate). Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale - from 1 (No visible nasolabial folds) to 5 (Extremely long and deep nasolabial folds) | 6 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale from baseline | Change in WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) from baseline at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment. Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale - from 1 (No visible nasolabial folds) to 5 (Extremely long and deep nasolabial folds) | 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Behnam D Bayatani | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinica Beyond Dental | Timișoara | Timiș County | Romania |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25763894 | Background | Attenello NH, Maas CS. Injectable fillers: review of material and properties. Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;31(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1544924. Epub 2015 Mar 12. | |
| 29701621 | Background | Monheit G, Beer K, Hardas B, Grimes PE, Weichman BM, Lin V, Murphy DK. Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study. Dermatol Surg. 2018 May;44(5):670-678. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Champely, S. (2020). pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. R package version 1.3-0. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008224 | Lymphoma, Follicular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Proportion of participants with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the WSRS |
Proportion of participants with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) at 1, 3 and 12 months after the last treatment (response rates) Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale - from 1 (No visible nasolabial folds) to 5 (Extremely long and deep nasolabial folds) |
| 1, 3 and 12 months |
| Change from baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance | Change from baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance scale - from 1 (Very Dissatisfied) to 4 (Very satisfied) | 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of participants having a positive aesthetic evolution on the 5-point GAIS | Proportion of participants having a positive aesthetic evolution on the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) evaluated by the physician and subject at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment. 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale - from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (worse) | 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Short- and long-term adverse effects | Short- and long-term adverse effects within 2 weeks of the initial or touch-up treatment and during 6, 12 months after the last treatment of the study course, respectively. | 6 and 12 months |
| D008232 |
| Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |