Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The process of facial aging is a result of intricate alterations occurring at both the microscopic and macroscopic levels, leading to changes in facial volume. The observed alterations can be attributed to the process of bone structure resorption, the influence of gravity, redistribution of subcutaneous fat, and injury to the skin. Dermal fillers are utilized for the purpose of enhancing facial features in accordance with the aesthetic ideals of beauty. These ideals prescribe specific curves, contours, dimensions, and ratios that must be achieved in order to create a face that is generally considered appealing. Additionally, dermal fillers are employed to replenish volumetric dimensions and restore a more youthful appearance to the aging face (Wongprasert et al. 2022).
Over a period of time, the convex shape of the midface region has the potential to undergo a flattening or concave transformation. The contour alterations observed can be attributed to the descent of the malar soft tissue complex from the zygoma and orbital rims in an inferomedial direction, as well as the atrophy of the malar fat pad. The malar groove, also known as the zygomatic hollow, is a linear indentation that traverses the zygoma in a diagonal manner, running parallel to the nasolabial fold.
Dermal fillers have the potential to reinstate midface volume effectively and augment malar features. The malar augmentation technique involves using dermal filler materials that provide enhanced structural support, making it an operation that is classified as advanced within the field of dermal fillers (Small, Hoang 2012).
KOS® S in the dermis regulates water balance, osmotic pressure and ion flow and functions as a sieve, excluding certain molecules, enhancing the extracellular domain of cell surfaces and stabilizes skin structures by electrostatic interactions.
The Research Question of the present study is the following: to collect sufficient clinical data to demonstrate compliance with the General Safety and Performance Requirements of KOS® S when used as intended.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of KOS® S in correcting "Moderate" or "Severe" infraorbital hollowing by assessing the response rate using the Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale (AIHS) from the baseline (Response is defined as at least 1-point improvement on the AIHS at month 3 after last treatment).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOS® S | Other | An open, non-comparative, interventional single-armed clinical trial. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOS® S | Device | Delivery of medical device as injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of subjects with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the AIHS | Proportion of subjects with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the AIHS (Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale) at month 3 after the last treatment (response rate). Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale - from 0 (No visible hollowing or volume loss medially or laterally) to 4 (Defined hollowing extends from medial to lateral canthus, severe volume loss creates a marked step along the lid-cheek junction) | 3 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the AIHS from baseline | Change in the AIHS from baseline at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment. Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale (AIHS) - from 0 (No visible hollowing or volume loss medially or laterally) to 4 (Defined hollowing extends from medial to lateral canthus, severe volume loss creates a marked step along the lid-cheek junction) | 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Behnam D Bayatani | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinica Beyond Dental | Timișoara | Timiș County | Romania |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35293660 | Background | Wongprasert P, Dreiss CA, Murray G. Evaluating hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: A critique of current characterization methods. Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jun;35(6):e15453. doi: 10.1111/dth.15453. Epub 2022 Apr 5. | |
| 25763894 | Background | Attenello NH, Maas CS. Injectable fillers: review of material and properties. Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;31(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1544924. Epub 2015 Mar 12. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Champely, S. (2020). pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. R package version 1.3-0. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Medical Device (pre-market effectiveness and safety, class III)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Proportion of participants with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the AIHS | Proportion of participants with at least 1-point improvement from baseline on the AIHS at 1, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment (response rates) Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale (AIHS) - from 0 (No visible hollowing or volume loss medially or laterally) to 4 (Defined hollowing extends from medial to lateral canthus, severe volume loss creates a marked step along the lid-cheek junction) | 1, 6 and 12 months |
| Change from baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction with Eyes | Change from baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction with Eyes scores at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment. FACE-Q Satisfaction with Eyes scale: from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) | 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Secondary outcomes | Proportion of participants having a positive aesthetic evolution on the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) evaluated by the physician and subject at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment | 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Short- and long-term adverse effects | Short- and long-term adverse effects within 2 weeks of the initial or touch-up treatment and during 6, 12 months after the last treatment of the study course, respectively | 2 weeks, 6, 12 months |
| 34351386 | Background | Fabi S, Zoumalan C, Fagien S, Yoelin S, Sartor M, Chawla S. A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study of VYC-15L, a Hyaluronic Acid Filler, in Adults for Correction of Infraorbital Hollowing. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Oct 15;41(11):NP1675-NP1685. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab308. |