Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cosmeta Corp, A Gel-Del Technologies Company | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, double-blind pivotal study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CosmetaLife injectable dermal filler for the correction of wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds (i.e., smile lines).
Patients with negative reaction skin test results will be randomized to receive CosmetaLife in one nasolabial fold and Control in the nasolabial fold on the opposite side of the face (split face design). Each subject will serve as his or her own control, allowing for comparison of the outcome between the contralateral sides. Patients will be followed at 2 weeks and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post treatment for assessment of safety and effectiveness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CosmetaLife | Experimental | Test Article was given at start and two week follow up if necessary, up to a maximum dose of 2 cc to achieve optimal correction as determined by investigator. |
|
| Restylane | Active Comparator | Control Article was given at start and two week follow up if necessary, up to a maximum dose of 2 cc to achieve optimal correction as determined by investigator. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CosmetaLife | Device | Dermal filler |
| |
| Restylane |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale | To determine if the mean change in the 5-point Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score at 6 months was non-inferior to the contralateral Control Restylane treated side, where on this 5-point scale 1 has no measurable nasolabial fold, 2 has some fold, 3 has moderate fold, 4 has heavier moderate fold, and a 5 has deep to a very deep nasolabial fold. For this study only moderate nasolabial folds were included (i.e., 3 or 4), where subjects scored as 5 were excluded. | baseline and 6 months |
| Adverse Event Reporting | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety and Effectiveness of CosmetaLife at 3, 9 and 12 Months | 3, 9 and 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David B. Masters, Ph.D. | Cosmeta™ Corp | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beauty Renewed | Tracy | California | 95376 | United States | ||
| North Atlantic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CosmetaLife vs Restylane | Split-face double blind study design used so each subject received each treatment followed by a two week touch up treatment, where no subject received more than 2cc of either CosmetaLife or Restylane treatment. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CosmetaLife vs Restylane | Split-face double blind study design used so each subject received each treatment followed by a two week touch up treatment, where no subject received more than 2cc of either CosmetaLife or Restylane treatment. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale | To determine if the mean change in the 5-point Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score at 6 months was non-inferior to the contralateral Control Restylane treated side, where on this 5-point scale 1 has no measurable nasolabial fold, 2 has some fold, 3 has moderate fold, 4 has heavier moderate fold, and a 5 has deep to a very deep nasolabial fold. For this study only moderate nasolabial folds were included (i.e., 3 or 4), where subjects scored as 5 were excluded. | Analysis was intention to treat (ITT) and each subject received both CosmetaLife and Control (Restylane) injections into contralateral nasolabial folds, respectively. WSRS units (change from baseline analyzed) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on scale | baseline and 6 months |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CosmetaLife |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. David B. Masters | Cosmeta, A Gel-Del Technolgies Company | 651 209-0707 | dmasters@gel-del.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Dermal filler |
|
| Roswell |
| Georgia |
| 30076 |
| United States |
| SkinCare Physicians of Chestnut Hill | Chestnut Hill | Massachusetts | 02467 | United States |
| Cosmetic Care Center, LLC | Edina | Minnesota | 55424 | United States |
| Minnesota Clinical Study Center | Fridley | Minnesota | 55432 | United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Restylane (Control) | Restylane (Control) injected nasolabial fold contralateral side |
|
|
|
| Primary | Adverse Event Reporting | Not Posted | 6 months |
| Secondary | Safety and Effectiveness of CosmetaLife at 3, 9 and 12 Months | Not Posted | 3, 9 and 12 months |
| 0 |
| 145 |
| 0 |
| 145 |
| EG001 | Restylane (Control) | 0 | 145 | 0 | 145 |
Study results were presented and published at national meetings. Standard confidentiality agreements were signed by PIs for company confidential information.