Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled clinical study will be carried out to compare the digital with conventional impression procedures for the restoration of single implants in an esthetic zone by assessing:
fourteen patients with single nonrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone participated in the study and were replaced with immediate implants with immediate customized provisional restoration after 3 months they recalled for the impression, seven with digital and the others with conventional and evaluated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital impression with intraoral scanner | Active Comparator | included seven participants with non-restorable tooth in esthetic zone replaced by immediate implants receiving a single all ceramic crown fabricated with full digital procedure consisting of digital impression with intraoral scanner, and Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacture (CAD/CAM) procedure. |
|
| conventional impression technique | Active Comparator | included seven participants with non-restorable tooth in esthetic zone replaced by immediate implants receiving a single all ceramic crown fabricated with Conventional impression-taking with polyvinyl siloxane, plaster model pouring and lost-wax casting technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra oral scanner | Device | Immediate implant placement with customized healing abutment and after three months placement all ceramic crown by digital impression using intra oral scanner |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| pink esthetic score | The pink esthetic score is based on seven variables:
| at the baseline(time of impression), second time was one week later (immediately) after crown placement, third time was one month later after crown placement , fourth time was three months later after crown placement |
| marginal bone loss | described by millimeter using paralleling technique | immediately after crown placement (baseline), then three months after crown placement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| patient satisfaction | satisfaction questionnaire modified from based on 10 specific questions. The questions were as follows:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| ola A ezzat, professsor | faculty of dentistry-Ain shams university | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Cairo Governorate | 11566 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| impression analog | Device | Immediate implant placement with customized healing abutment and after three months placement of all ceramic crowns by conventional impression |
|
|
| after crown placement |
| plaque index | 0 = No plaque in gingival area.
| Immediately after crown placement (baseline), one months later , and finally three months after crown placement |
| gingival index | 0 = Normal gingiva.
| Immediately after crown placement (baseline), one months later , and finally three months after crown placement |