Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To achieve an optimal contact area is essential to avoid tooth migration, food impaction, and the occurrence of secondary caries. However, proximal restorations constitute challenge for the professional and tight contact points are difficult to obtain depending not only on tools used, but also on type of restorative material. Current tooth-colored restorative materials are not condensable and there is shrinkage with setting. The aim of this study is to compare the proximal contact tightness of zirconia reinforced glass ionomer versus conventional nanohybrid resin composite when used in class II cavities.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zirconomer in Class II cavities | Experimental | Zirconia modified glass ionomer restorative material |
|
| Nanohybrid composite in Class II cavities | Active Comparator | Conventionally used aesthetic restorations in class II |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zirconomer | Procedure | zirconia modified glass ionomer |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Contact Tightness | Measuring the adequacy of proximal contact restoration using intervention ' zirconomer" versus control which is Nanohybrid resin composite. Heaviness of this contact using Modified USPHS criteria. USPHS criteria are standardized in which a dental floss is used. Contact tightness can have one of three scores: Alpha Bravo Charlie | baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year |
Not provided
Not provided
Eligibility Criteria of participants:
Inclusion Criteria of participants:
Exclusion criteria of participants:
Pregnancy.
Disabilities.
Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
Allergic history concerning methacrylate.
Rampant caries.
Heavy smoking.
Xerostomia.
Lack of compliance.
Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular joint disorders.
b- Eligibility Criteria of teeth:
Inclusion Criteria of teeth:
Exclusion criteria of the teeth:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alaa F Abdelsalam, phD | lecturer of conservative dentistry, Cairo university | Principal Investigator |
| Hadier M Gad, PhD | Lecturer of conservative dentistry, Cairo university | Principal Investigator |
| Manar A Elmokanen, PhD | Lecturer of conservative dentistry, Cairo University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of dentistry Cairo university | Cairo | Manyal | 11555 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Nanohybrid composite |
| Procedure |
conventional composite |
|