Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| cairo university | Other Grant/Funding Number | faculty of pedatric dentistry |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Is zirconomer restorative material more effective than a glass ionomer cement in restoration of primary molars
This trial seeks to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of two materials zirconomer restorative material and glass ionomer cement to achieve better treatment for primary molars.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zirconomer Restorative material in primary molar | Experimental | Arm one zirconomer restorative material (intervention) |
|
| Glass Ionomer Cement in primary molar | Active Comparator | Arm two Glass Ionomer cement (control) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zirconia reinforced glass ionomer | Other | Restorative material |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrent CariesColor match | Radiographic Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS | 12 MONTHS |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Color match | visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS | 12 MONTHS |
| Marginal Discoloration | using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Children having carious primary molars(class1) without pulp exposure and normal radiograph.
Children between age 5 and 7 years.
Both male and female are included.
Cooperative Children.
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamador A hmedIbrahim ali, Master | Contact | 347-933-7140 | tamadurah699@gamil.com | |
| Mujahed a hmed Ibrahim Ali, MASTER | Contact | 749-404-6041 | Mugahed.ali95@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| sherien ez zaldein, professor | Cairo University | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34904122 | Background | Nanavati K, Katge F, Chimata VK, Pradhan D, Kamble A, Patil D. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Dec;22(4):260-266. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87115.1230. | |
| 35528493 |
Not provided
Not provided
study protocol and statistical analysis
after one year
with other investigator including who will work with systematic review ,will provide the clinical study report with the documents above
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005899 | Glass Ionomer Cements |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003738 | Dental Cements |
| D003764 | Dental Materials |
| D001697 | Biomedical and Dental Materials |
| D008420 | Manufactured Materials |
Not provided
Not provided
last decade has seen several innovative additions to enhance the properties of GIC whilst simplifying its usage. Unlike the early glass-ionomers, these newer systems are easy and more practical to use as a dental restorative and luting material for preschoolers, children and teenagers alike. These new varieties are composed of ceramic and zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cements were introduced to provide better drawbacks of amalgam as well as tooth-colored restorative materials exhibiting the strength of amalgam and at the same time maintain the fluoride releasing capacity of GIC providing better mechanical properties.
Not provided
Not provided
statistician
| Glass ionomer cement | Other | Restorative material |
|
|
| 12 MONTHS |
| Marginal Adaptation | using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS | 12 MONTHS |
| -Anatomic Form | using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS | 12 MONTHS |
| Kukreja R, Singla S, Bhadoria N, Pawar P, Gupta K, Khandelwal D, Dewani N. An In Vitro Study to Compare the Release of Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) and Zirconomer. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2141. |
| Background | undefined |
| 34393122 | Background | Mushtaq U, Mushtaq F, Thakur D, Rathee K, Poonia N, Khullar S. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Following Restoration of Class I Lesions with Different Restorative Materials: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):650-654. |
| 35439879 | Background | Arora D, Jain M, Suma Sogi HP, Shahi P, Gupta I, Sandhu M. In vivo evaluation of clinical performance of Cention N and glass ionomer cement in proximal restorations of primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Jan-Mar;40(1):23-29. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_108_21. |
| 30034008 | Background | Albeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer(R): A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2. |
| D013676 |
| Technology, Industry, and Agriculture |