Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative Material Versus a Glass Ionomer Cement in Restoration of Primary Molars A Randomized Clinical Trial
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative Material Versus a Glass Ionomer Cement in Restoration of Primary Molars A Randomized Clinical Trial
Is zirconomer restorative material more effective than a glass ionomer cement in restoration of primary molars
This trial seeks to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of two materials zirconomer restorative material and glass ionomer cement to achieve better treatment for primary molars.
Inclusion criteria:
Children having carious primary molars(class1) without pulp exposure and normal radiograph.
Children between age 5 and 7 years.
Both male and female are included.
Cooperative Children.
Exclusion criteria: