Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of Zirconomer Improved GI restoration compared to Conventional viscous GI restoration in geriatric patients with Posterior carious lesions in class I or II cavities
This study will be conducted to determine the clinical performance of the Zirconia reinforced glass ionomer restorations ( Zirconomer improved) under stress bearing posterior area (class I or claa II cavities) in geriatric population in comparison to Conventional viscous glass ionomer restorations (Ketac molar quick Aplicap) using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria
P: Geriatric Patients with posterior Caries lesions I: Zirconia reinforced GI (Zirconomer Improved) C: Conventional viscous GI, (Ketac Molar quick Aplicap) O: The Clinical performance of the Glass Ionomer restorations Using USPHS Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| zirconomer improved | Experimental | zirconia reinforced glass ionomer restoration |
|
| ketac molar quick aplicap | Active Comparator | conventional viscous glass ionomer restoration |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zirconomer Improved | Drug | glass ionomer restoration reinforced with nano-zirconia particles to improve strength and esthetics |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performance | clinical performance of the Glass Ionomer restorations using modified USPHS criteria | 1 year |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doaa Abdou | Giza | 12573 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27156000 | Background | Klinke T, Daboul A, Turek A, Frankenberger R, Hickel R, Biffar R. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field. Trials. 2016 May 8;17(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1339-8. | |
| 27461814 | Background | Walia R, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Ahuja L. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;34(3):280-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.186746. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Ketac Molar quick Aplicap | Drug | highly viscous glass ionomer with improved mechanical properties than the conventional GI |
|
|
| 30034008 | Background | Albeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer(R): A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2. |
| 29663908 | Background | de Franca Lopes CMC, Schubert EW, Martins AS, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Chibinski ACR, Wambier DS. Randomized Clinical Trial of ART Class II Restorations Using Two Glass Ionomer Cements: One-Year Follow-Up. Pediatr Dent. 2018 Mar 15;40(2):98-104. |
| 21840585 | Background | Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011 Oct;27(10):1031-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 15. |