Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to investigate consecutive biological changes in proximal contact tightness using digital force gauge and evaluate proximal contact location using cone beam computed tomography between class II direct composite restorations and adjacent teeth after using sectional matrix system and with different contact forming instruments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palodent® plus sectional matrix system "Control group" | Active Comparator |
| |
| PerForm™ "Experimental" | Experimental |
| |
| Trimax™ "Experimental" | Experimental |
| |
| Contact Pro™ "Experimental" | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precontoured sectional matrix EZ COAT | Other | All teeth will be treated with (Palodent ® plus sectional matrix system) (sectional matrix, biting ring, plastic diamond wedge) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in proximal contact tightness | Proximal contact tightness (PCT) will be measured using the custom-made contact pressure system that was based on the tooth pressure meter, a device fabricated at the University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. (20) The system will use a 0.05-mm-thick metal strip inserted interdentally from An occlusal direction . The metal strip will be connected to the digital force gauge (Mark-10 series 2 digital force gauge). The tightness of the proximal contact will be quantified as the maximum frictional force when the strip will slowly removed in a buccal-lingual direction. The maximum force will be recorded on the screen of the gauge for each measurement when the gauge will be switched to peak-mode | baseline, immediately postoperative, 1 month, 3 month, 9 month, and 12 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in proximal contact location | calibration will be carried out by a radiologist, who evaluates the teeth carefully scrolling down through the images from the floor of the pulp chamber in all three orthogonal reconstructions (axial, coronal, and sagittal). To ensure image standardization, all cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images will be chosen from a single machine with a standard field of view, voxel size, exposure time and the thickness of the slice. CBCT images will be analyzed with the built-in digital imaging software. The measurement tool will be used to determine the total length of the crown of the restored teeth, measured from the tip of the mesiobuccal cusp to the cementoenamel junction. Based on this length, the crown portion will be divided into three levels: coronal, middle and apical thirds. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karim Mohamed Wahba Abbass | Alexandria | 00000 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37805456 | Derived | Abbassy KM, Elmahy WA, Holiel AA. Evaluation of the proximal contact tightness in class II resin composite restorations using different contact forming instruments: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03462-5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C078089 | PERform Soft |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will be a randomized control clinical trial in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines
Not provided
Not provided
Each case will be represented by a code and the group name. These will be sealed in a sequentially numbered opaque envelope and the set of envelopes will be given to the senior supervisor. When the investigator wants to enroll a new case, he will notify the supervisor who will take the next inline envelope and will write the name of the participant on it. At the time of intervention implementation, the investigator will open the sealed envelope and retrieve the allocation and apply.
| PerForm™ | Other | Treated with (PerForm™) as Contact Forming Instrument with (Palodent ® plus sectional matrix system) |
|
| AdDent Trimax™ | Other | Treated with (AdDent Trimax™) as Contact Forming Instrument with (Palodent ® plus sectional matrix system) |
|
| Contact Pro™ | Other | Treated with (Contact Pro™) as Contact Forming Instrument with (Palodent ® plus sectional matrix system) |
|
| baseline and immediately postoperative |