Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 640-Sur/ERC-06 | Other Identifier | Aga khan University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Several techniques have been advocated to get good contacts in dental composite restorations including interdental separation ring. The investigators study focuses on using separation ring with circumferential matrix band instead of a sectional band. Moreover, the investigators have attempted to study proximal tightness and proximal contours of composite restoration as separate variables
A total of 188 premolar teeth with proximal cavity to be assigned on alternate basis in two groups. Intervention group teeth received Automatrix band after cavity preparation followed by the separation ring using clamp while the control group received Automatrix band alone.
All teeth to be restored with P-60 composite restorative material(3M-ESPE Dental, USA). Outcome (proximal tightness) is determined by a blinded assessor just after the restoration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| automatrix band, Separation ring | Experimental | The prepared teeth received Automatrix band (similar to the control group, product code# 62422513). The Automatrix was burnished against the adjacent tooth gently. Anatomical wedges were applied in the proximal area and then the separation ring (BiTineĀ® round ring by Palodent systems, Dentsply International, DE, USA product # 659040) placed with the help of retainer forceps. |
|
| automatrix band | Active Comparator | Teeth received Automatrix band alone (Wide-Regular type, dimensions 7.9 mm height and 0.05mm thickness, product code # 62422513). It was secured on the prepared tooth and burnished against the adjacent tooth gently. Anatomical wedges were placed in the inter-proximal area gingival to the cavity preparation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Separation ring | Device | Separation ring placed along with automatrix band |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| proximal tightness | The tightness of the proximal contact area resulting from either of the two matrix band system. It was measured using a nine inch long nylon dental floss (Johnson and Johnson, USA). | 1 day (just after dental restoration) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| proximal contours | To be examined clinically with an explorer and mouth mirror and then on the periapical radiograph by the blinded co investigator. | 1 day (just after restoration placement) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overhang of the restoration | To be examined clinically with an explorer and mouth mirror and then on the periapical radiograph by the blinded co investigator. | 1 day (just after the restoration placement) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Farhan R Khan, FCPS | AKU | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental Clinics, Aga Khan University Hospital | Karachi | Sindh | 74800 | Pakistan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| automatrix band | Device | band placed with a tightening device |
|
|