Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The lower limb stability test was carried out by MicroSwing 6.0 gravity center moving trajectory tester made in Germany.
The test steps and methods are as follows:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PNF training group | Experimental | The experimental group will undergo 60 minutes of PNF training. |
|
| Control training group | Other | The control group will follow the curriculum standards set by the Sports University. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNF training | Other | The subjects underwent rehabilitation training for 8 weeks, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday, 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM in the Physical Education College of Guangxi Normal University), and the rehabilitation training time was about 40-45 minutes per person. Before each rehabilitation training, the subjects warmed up the ankle and lower leg muscles for 5 minutes, followed by the corresponding rehabilitation training for 30-35 minutes, and relaxed the ankle and lower leg muscles for 5 minutes after the training. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CAIT score | CAIT consists of 9 questions with a total of 30 points, scoring ≦27 points for diagnosis of functional ankle instability, 28 points and above for diagnosis of non-functional ankle instability.
| Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks |
| Lower limb stability test | The lower limb stability test was carried out by MicroSwing 6.0 gravity center moving trajectory tester made in Germany. The test steps and methods are as follows:
| Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks |
| Star offset balance test | The subjects stood in the center of the star chart with the affected side foot as the supporting foot, with bare feet and one foot in the center. The healthy side foot was extended forward, outward front, outer front, outer back, back, inner back, inner and inner front respectively to the farthest distance as far as possible. The supporting foot was extended in the counterclockwise direction when the left foot was used, and the supporting foot was extended in the clockwise direction when the right foot was used. The subject withdrew the non-supporting foot and resumed standing with both feet and rested for 5 seconds. The data of each extension of the subject was recorded, and the farthest score was measured three times. The furthest results in each direction were standardized with the subjects' lower limb length, and the data were recorded. (4) The furthest scores in each direction were standardized with the subjects' lower limb length, and the data were recorded. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzhen Ma | Contact | 18377336078 | msz20210607@126.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000294 | Adolescent Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Single (Participant)
- Page 2 of 5 [DRAFT] -In order to avoid mutual interference between the experimental group and the control group, a blinding method needs to be used in the study. In this study, a single blind experiment will be conducted to blind the participating athletes.
During the sample grouping process, participating athletes will not know the specific grouping situation.
|
| Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks |
| Muscle strength test | MicroFET2 hand-held muscle strength tester made in Germany was used for muscle strength test. The test steps and methods are as follows:
| Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks |