Outcomes of Three Ports Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Sohag General Surgery Department Experience

Outcomes of Three Ports Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Sohag General Surgery Department Experience

To compare the outcomes of three ports and four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

To compare the outcomes of three ports and four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Randomized clinical trial comparative study will be carried out on 50 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in general surgical department, Sohag University. An informed written consent will be obtained from the patients. Every patient will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study and will have a secret code number. Research results will be only used for scientific purposes. Any unexpected risks appearing during the course of research will be clarified to the participants and to the ethical committee on time.

Patients will be randomly classified into two equal groups; 25 patients will be enrolled in each group using computer generated random number in closed sealed envelope.

Group I (3-ports): 25 patients undergo a three-port LC. Group II (4-ports): 25 patients undergo a four-port LC. All patients will be subjected to thorough history taking (age, sex, symptoms, and duration of symptoms) and full clinical evaluation.

Abdominal ultrasound will be done in all patients. Baseline laboratory (complete blood count and coagulation profile) will be ordered in all patients.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 18 to 75 years.
• Both sexes.
• Patient with clinical, laboratory and/or radiological evidence that is a candidate for cholecystectomy operation.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient's refusal.
• Bile duct stones.
• History of obstructive jaundice.
• Severe acute calculus pancreatitis.
• Severe co-morbid diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, and severe direct hyperbilirubinemia).
• Prior surgery or adhesion.
• Radical cholecystectomy.
• Pregnancy.
• Malignancy.