Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. we aim to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome of 3 ports LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 ports LC with respect to safety and efficacy.

Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. we aim was to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 3 ports LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 To study the efficacy and feasibility of 3 port and 4 port lap cholecystetctomy.

1. To compare the intraoperative and post-operative complications of 3 port and 4 port lap cholecystectomy

1. Operative time,
2. Days of hospital stay.
3. complication
4. post-operative pain ports LC with respect to safety and efficacy.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age of patient between 25 and 65 years
2. Diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis, symptomatic cholelithiasis

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Choledocholithiasis
2. Severe Acute Calculus Pancreatitis
3. Severe co-morbid conditions (uncontrolled diabetes, Hypertension, severe direct hyper bilirubinemia) 4 . Previous operation or adhesion