Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Older Adults

Comparison of Two Low-dose Resistance Training Modalities on Strength, Functional Capacity, and Quality-of-life in Healthy, Community-dwelling, Untrained Older Adults: a Randomised Controlled Trial

The aims of this study were to:

1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy older adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.
2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training in older adults.

Older adults are defined as being 60 or more years of age.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Participants were eligible if they were between 30-60 years old
• Uninjured
• Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
• Had not participated in lower-limb resistance training in the previous six months.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants were excluded if they had either taken part in any lower-limb resistance training in the last six months
• Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in resistance training
• Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended physical activity guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense physical activity per week.