Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study aimed to introduce gamified physical fitness training in health education with the goal of enhancing physical activity levels and assessing its feasibility within a small-scale context involving 11-12-year-old children.
A cluster experimental design was conducted in a small-scale context of school children. Participants were recruited by inviting two elementary schools located in the same district area for testing the physical fitness training effects. Two schools were randomly assigned to either the training group (TG; n = 47) receiving physical fitness training or the control group (CG; n = 44) without the training. Through a three-step process, gamified physical fitness training was developed by a multidisciplinary team from the TG school. PA outcome indicators were assessed using AI-wireless sensors attached to participants' wrists over 12 weeks. Participants' satisfaction was used to assess the feasibility of implementing gamified physical fitness training in health education classes. Data collection occurred during school days for one week at three-time points: the first week (T1), 6th week (T2), and the 12th week (T3). Generalized estimating equation statistics were used to assess the program effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| physical fitness training | Experimental | The training group received physical fitness training for 12 weeks |
|
| No training group | No Intervention | The no training group did not receive any training program |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| physical fitness training | Other | Through a three-step process, gamified physical fitness training was developed by a multidisciplinary team. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| physical activity levels | PA levels were measured in minutes spent on daily steps, total physical activity (TPA), light physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and daily step counts using AI-wireless sensors attached to participants' wrists. | week 0 |
| Learning Self-Efficacy | Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (LSES) contains 18 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 4 items reversely scored. The total score of LSES ranges from -6 to 66, with higher scores reflecting higher LSE. | week 0 |
| physical activity levels | PA levels were measured in minutes spent on daily steps, total physical activity (TPA), light physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and daily step counts using AI-wireless sensors attached to participants' wrists. | week 6 |
| physical activity levels | PA levels were measured in minutes spent on daily steps, total physical activity (TPA), light physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and daily step counts using AI-wireless sensors attached to participants' wrists. | week 12 |
| Learning Self-Efficacy | Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (LSES) contains 18 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 4 items reversely scored. The total score of LSES ranges from -6 to 66, with higher scores reflecting higher LSE. | week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction levels | For the satisfaction of the PA program, the evaluation was conducted at the 12-week, encompassing five aspects: the integration of physical training into the HE classes, the content of the physical training, the application of gamification strategies in training, the active play during class breaks, and the effectiveness of GHPT in improving PA. Responses to levels of satisfaction with the training program were assessed across five categories: very satisfied, satisfied, OK, dissatisfied, and extremely dissatisfied. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chi-Jane Wang, Ph.D. | Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chi-Jane Wang | Tainan | 701 | Taiwan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Week 12 |