Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The present clinical comparative study will be undertaken for assessment of two different modalities of maxillary canine retraction assisted with microosteoperforations versus injectable platelet rich fibrin.
Group I: will include 9 patients who willreceive MOPs with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.
â–ª Group II: will include 9 patients receive i-PRF that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group MOPs | Experimental | Group MOPs : will include 9 patients who willreceive MOPs with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol. |
|
| Group IMOPS | No Intervention | other side in group which is control group | |
| Group i-PRF | Experimental | group i-PRF: will include 9 patients receive i-PRF that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol |
|
| group i-PRF2 | No Intervention | other side in group which is control group |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| injectable platelet rich fibrin versus microosteoperforation | Combination Product | injectable platelet rich fibrin which is second product of blood versus microosteoperforation which is surgical procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Direct clinical assessment of the amount of maxillary canine retraction i.e. amount of extraction space closure before and after four months observation period and on every 28 days observation period according to standardized method | Direct clinical assessment of the amount of maxillary canine retraction i.e. amount of extraction space closure before and after four months observation and every 28 days period and on every 28 days observation period according to standardized method. 2. Study cast assessment: • The amount of maxillary canine retraction on both sides will be measured immediately before starting canine retraction and at each observation interval by using a software for the scanned models according to standardized method | 4months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlAzhar university | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24182579 | Result | Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017. | |
| 33481053 | Result | Zeitounlouian TS, Zeno KG, Brad BA, Haddad RA. Effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement : A randomized split-mouth-controlled trial. J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Jul;82(4):268-277. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00275-x. Epub 2021 Jan 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided