Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Herbal Medicine for Cancer Immunotherapy Combined With Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage II-III Breast Cancer.
Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Herbal Medicine for Cancer Immunotherapy Combined With Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage II-III Breast Cancer.
This is a randomized, open label Phase II neoadjuvant study comparing the efficacy and safety of the combination of traditional herbal medicine for cancer immunotherapy and neoadjuvant therapy versus neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer.
This is a randomized, open label Phase II neoadjuvant study comparing the efficacy and safety of the combination of traditional herbal medicine for cancer immunotherapy and neoadjuvant therapy versus neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the two treatment arms: arm 1, combination of traditional herbal medicine for cancer immunotherapy and neoadjuvant therapy for 6 or 8 cycles; arm 2, neoadjuvant therapy 6 or 8 cycles. Patients will undergo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy. Efficacy will be assessed every 2 cycles.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
liucg@sj-hospital.org18940254967
caos4228@163.com18940254228
Shenyang, Liaoning 110022, China
liucg@sj-hospital.org+8618940254967
niunannancy@163.com+8618940256668
18940254228