Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of this study is to compare pelvimetric measurements performed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and by the EOS imaging system.
During pregnancy, after failure of External Manual Version (EMV) in case of breech fetal presentation, a radiological pelvimetry is performed to evaluate the measurements of the pelvis and decide on the appropriate mode of delivery.
Several imaging modalities are used, including pelvic computed tomography (CT),and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis.
CT scan has the disadvantage of maternal irradiation and MRI has the disadvantage of an inaccurate morphological analysis.The EOS® system is an imaging tool used in radiopediatric to allow precise morphological analysis of bone masses with minimal irradiation.
The quality of the morphological analysis and measurements provided by the EOS® imaging system is the reason for proposing this study comparing the pelvimetric measurements obtained by MRI and by the EOS® imaging system.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelvimetry group | Experimental | The participants oh this group will successively perform MRI pelvimetry and EOS imaging. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelvimetric measurements | Other | The patients in this group are pregnant women after failure of external manual version (EMV) in case of breech fetal presentation. The participants will successively perform MRI pelvimetry (conventional management) and EOS imaging. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using Transverse Inlet Diameter measurement | Transverse Inlet Diameter Measurement obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters. | Up to 1 day |
| Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using ante posterior diameter measurement | Ante posterior diameter of the pelvic inlet obtained by using EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters. | Up to 1 day |
| Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using BiSpinous Diameter measurement | BiSpinous Diameter obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters. | Up to 1 day |
| Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using Bi-ischiatic mesurement | Bi-ischiatic measurement obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters. | Up to 1 day |
| Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using Magin's Index calculation | Magnin's Index calculation obtained by using EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters. | Up to 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pelvis morphological description using Cadwell and Moloy classification | Caldwell and Moloy classification (scale) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified. | Up to 1 day |
| Pelvis morphological description using subpubic angle measurement |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Didier R RIETHMULLER, MD, PhD | University Hospital, Grenoble | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pr Riethmuller Didier | Grenoble | 38043 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29567122 | Background | Aubry S, Padoin P, Petegnief Y, Vidal C, Riethmuller D, Delabrousse E. Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Sep;99(9):569-576. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001946 | Breech Presentation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007744 | Obstetric Labor Complications |
| D011248 | Pregnancy Complications |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The measurement of the subpubic angle (in degree) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
| Up to 1 day |
| Pelvis morphological description using obturating holes appearance | The appearance of the obturating holes (descriptive analysis) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified. | Up to 1 day |
| Characterization of radiation doses received by EOS® system. | Estimation of irradiation | Up to 1 day |
| Evaluation of the intra and inter-observer reproducibility for radiological interpretation | Blind independent reading of MRI and EOS® images by two radiologists on two different days. | 4 days |
| Evaluation of the intra and inter-observer reproducibility for clinical interpretation | Blind independent reading of MRI and EOS® images by two independent clinician on two different days with conclusion on the mode of delivery. | 4 days |