Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galilee medical center | Other Identifier | Bar Ilan University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy.
Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and the actual birthweight will be recorded and compared with the fetal weight estimations
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy.
Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and the actual birthweight will be recorded and compared with the fetal weight estimations inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies at term, suspected fetal macrosomia (>4000 gr in non GDM and >3800 gr. in GDM cases exclusion criteria-fetal anomaly, PPROM, multiple gestation The radiologist and the sonographer will be blinded to the fetal weight estimation and to the other estimation done
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| suspected macrosomia | Experimental | suspected macrosomia at term who will undergo sonographic and MRI fetal weight estimation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fetal MRI | Diagnostic Test | all participant will undergo MRI fetal weight estimation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MRI fetal weight estimation accuracy | gram | from enollment to Performing the MRI at 1 week |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
singleton pregnancy at term, suspected fetal macrosomia,
Exclusion Criteria:
pregnant women
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maya Frank Wolf, Prof. | Contact | 972-50-7887800 | mayaw@gmc.gov.il |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Amal shahin | Galilee Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galilee medical center | Recruiting | Nahariya | Israel |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1951539 | Background | Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):831-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90424-p. | |
| 34358479 | Background | Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dutemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2):238.e1-238.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 26224221 | Background | Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):77-88. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13517. Epub 2015 Jul 29. |