Smoking is still one of the most important risk factors causing morbidity and mortality in Sweden. Every year, 12,000 Swedish citizens die prematurely from smoking, and smoking is responsible for up to 60% of the inequity in health.

Though the smoking prevalence is relatively low in Sweden in an international context (8% and 10% for men and women respectively in 2016), specific vulnarable groups have a very high prevalence; e.g. about 80% in alcohol and drug abusers. Furthermore, Sweden has a unique high prevalence of snus users and in 2016 the daily use of tobacco was 25% for men and 14% for women. In addition, products such as cigarettes, snus, and e-cigettes are often mixed.

Despite the fact that about a thousand counsellors have been trained in manual-based person-centred tobacco cessation interventions in Sweden, the effectiveness of the interventions remains unknown, as a follow-up on effect of in-person interventions is not systematically collected in Sweden. Therefore, as of today it is not possible, on a national level, to compare the effectiveness of differences in these interventions, providers, or different groups of tobacco users including disadvantaged and vulnerable groups.

In this study the investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of already implemented in-person cessation interventions targeting smoking, use of snus and/or e-cigarettes, focusing on disadvantaged and vulnerable groups of tobacco users. Furthermore, important factors associated with a successful outcome after controlling for confounders will be identified (in relation to programme, patients and setting).

Inclusion Criteria:

• All adult tobacco users (of at least 18 years of age), including disadvantaged and vulnerable patients, receiving an in-person intervention (incl. online meetings) for tobacco cessation (smoking, snus and/or e-cigarettes) are eligible for inclusion in the project after giving informed consent.
• Both individual and group-based interventions can be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Withdrawing consent.
• Reduced ability to give informed consent, due to inadequate language skills, dementia, and other conditions.

The population in this study are tobacco users in Sweden, who have attented an in-person tobacco cessation programme.