Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study focuses on comparing the effect of MPM with or without collagen membrane on delayed implant placement in anterior maxillary aesthetic zone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| mineralized plasmatic matrix with collagen membrane | Experimental |
| |
| mineralized plasmatic matrix without collagen membrane | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mineralized plasmatic matrix with collagen membrane | Biological | Two tubes of 9 ml of patient's venous blood were collected, the tubes were placed in the centrifuge machine at 2500 rpm for 12 minutes. The resultant product consists of the following two layers:
After implant placement, the buccal bone defect was grafted with MPM and covered by collagen membrane |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Pain | The visual analog scale was used to gauge the degree of post-operative pain with a scale from zero (lowest) to ten (highest) | up to 1 week |
| Postoperative Edema | A visual descriptor analogue scale was utilized to indicate presence/ absence of edema and inflammation with a scale of zero (lowest) to 5 (highest) | up to 1 week |
| Peri-implant Probing depth | Probing depth refers to the distance between the gingival margin and the bottom of the pocket. Mesial and distal pockets were measured as close as possible to contact points from the buccal aspect while facial and lingual pockets were measured at the midline of the implant. To prevent excessive tissue damage and over extension into the healthy tissue, the peri-implant sulcus depth was made with light force. | up to 9 months |
| Implant stability | The implant stability was measured by Osstell®.The stability was evaluated on buccal, palatal, mesial and distal sides of the implant and the mean values of implant stability quotients ISQs were calculated. SQ, or Implant Stability Quotient, is a scale from 1 to 100 and is a measure of the stability of an implant. The ISQ scale has a non-linear correlation to micro mobility. High stability means >70 ISQ, between 60-69 is medium stability and < 60 ISQ is considered as low stability. | up to 3 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yomna M Abo Serie, BDS | Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | Principal Investigator |
| Moustafa El Dibany, PhD | Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | Study Director |
| Gaafar N El Halawani, PhD | Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | Alexandria | 21527 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| mineralized plasmatic matrix (MPM) without collagen membrane | Biological | Two tubes of 9 ml of patient's venous blood were collected, the tubes were placed in the centrifuge machine at 2500 rpm for 12 minutes. The resultant product consists of the following two layers:
After implant placement, the buccal bone defect was grafted with MPM. |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016301 | Alveolar Bone Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001862 | Bone Resorption |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D055093 | Periodontal Atrophy |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C083299 | 1-methyl-1-piperidinomethane sulfonate |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided