G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for RAEB-1,REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allo-HSCT

G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs. G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for Patients With RAEB-1, RAEB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure MDS and AML secondary to MDS. At present, the best conditioning regimen for MDS and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. In this prospective study, the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.

Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure MDS and AML secondary to MDS. At present, the best conditioning regimen for MDS and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. Our previous study has showed that G-CSF+DAC+BUCY conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse and improve the survival compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the two conditioning regimens both have high non-relapse mortality (NRM). Several retrospective and prospective studies including ours have demonstrated that BF conditioning regimen has a lower NRM compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the relapse and survival are similar in patients undergoing BF and BUCY conditioning regimens. Based on the above, we design the prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT.

Inclusion Criteria:

• RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT
• 14-65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
• Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)