Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Peking University People's Hospital | OTHER |
| Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, China | OTHER |
| Guangzhou First People's Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure high-risk MDS patients. At present, the best conditioning regimen for high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. In this prospective study, the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.
Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure high-risk MDS patients. At present, the best conditioning regimen for high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. A previous study by the investigators has showed that G-CSF +DAC+BUCY conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse and improve the survival compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the two conditioning regimens both have high non-relapse mortality (NRM). Several retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that BF conditioning regimen has a lower NRM compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the relapse and survival are similar in patients undergoing BF and BUCY conditioning regimens. Based on the above, the investigators design the prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| G-CSF+DAC+BF | Experimental | For patients with high-risk MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BF conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3, Fludarabine (FLU) 30mg/m2/ day on days -7 to -3. |
|
| G-CSF+DAC+BUCY | Active Comparator | For patients with high-risk MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony -Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3, -2. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF) | Drug | G-CSF was administered at 5 ug/kg/day on days-17 to -10. When white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Non-relapse mortality (NRM) | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival (OS) | 1 year | |
| Disease-free survival (DFS) | 1 year | |
| Cumulative incidence of relapse |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li Xuan | Contact | +86-020-62787883 | 356135708@qq.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Qifa Liu | Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University | Recruiting | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510515 | China |
Not provided
| Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University |
| OTHER |
| First People's Hospital of Chenzhou | OTHER |
| The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Decitabine (DAC) | Drug | Decitabine was administered at 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10. |
|
| Busulfan | Drug | Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4 in G-CSF+DAC+BUCY group. |
|
| Fludarabine (FLU) | Drug | Fludarabine was administered at 30 mg/m2/day on days -7 to -3. |
|
| Cyclophosphamide (CY) | Drug | Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3,-2. |
|
| Busulfan (BU) | Drug | Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3 in G-CSF+DAC +BF group. |
|
| 1 year |
| Adverse effects | within 100 days post-transplantation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009190 | Myelodysplastic Syndromes |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001855 | Bone Marrow Diseases |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077209 | Decitabine |
| D002066 | Busulfan |
| C024352 | fludarabine |
| D003520 | Cyclophosphamide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001374 | Azacitidine |
| D001372 | Aza Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D012263 | Ribonucleosides |
| D002072 | Butylene Glycols |
| D006018 | Glycols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D008698 | Mesylates |
| D000476 | Alkanesulfonates |
| D017738 | Alkanesulfonic Acids |
| D000473 | Alkanes |
| D006839 | Hydrocarbons, Acyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D013451 | Sulfonic Acids |
| D013456 | Sulfur Acids |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D010752 | Phosphoramide Mustards |
| D009588 | Nitrogen Mustard Compounds |
| D009150 | Mustard Compounds |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D063088 | Phosphoramides |
| D009943 | Organophosphorus Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided