Evaluation of the Added Value of Metamizole to Standard Postoperative Treatment After Ambulant Shoulder Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of the Added Value of Metamizole to Standard Postoperative Treatment After Ambulant Shoulder Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to investigate if the combination of metamizole and paracetamol is superior in reducing post-operative pain on day 1 after ambulatory shoulder surgery where the use of NSAIDs is prohibited compared to paracetamol treatment.
Therefore, a monocenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled superiority trial will be designed to investigate the superiority of the combination of metamizole and paracetamol compared to paracetamol treatment in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with tendon repair.
In an ambulatory setting, good post-operative analgesia is challenging because patients have to control pain at home by themselves, in the absence of hospital staff. Moreover, there is a limit in the type of analgesia that is available (i.e. no strong opioids) as well as in the route of administration (i.e. no epidural, intravenous, subcutaneous, or intramuscular route) at home. Nowadays a multimodal approach based on a combination of paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and, if necessary, weak opioids to control pain has been advocated in the ambulatory setting. Local and regional anesthesia also has been advocated in the ambulatory setting to relieve pain for 8 to 24 hours after surgery. Despite this multimodal pain therapy, the prevalence of outpatients suffering from moderate to severe acute postoperative pain at home remains high and varies from 9 to 40%. More specifically, some patients seem to be at high risk to develop moderate to severe pain on the fourth postoperative day, among which patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Besides this high prevalence, recent findings suggest that the use of NSAIDs is detrimental to tendon healing, especially in early stages. This negative impact is due to its effect on both proliferation and migration of tendon cells, as well as the inflammation reaction involved in the healing process and the bone growth necessary for tendon-to-bone healing. Healing of injured tendon proceeds through three phases: inflammation, regeneration, and remodeling/maturation. The initial phase involves an inflammatory response, in which the pro-inflammatory cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)/prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) pathway is of major importance. In the regenerative phase of a tendon injury, tendon cells migrate towards a repair site, proliferate and deposit extracellular matrix (ECM) in the tissue. The expression of paxillin, a positive regulator of cell mobility, is downregulated by ibuprofen, resulting in inhibited tendon cell migration. Moreover, treatment decreases DNA synthesis and gene expression in tendon cells, harming proliferation, and interfering with normal processes of ECM remodeling. Furthermore, the resulting p21CYP1 expression and decreased Rb protein phosphorylation are associated with inhibited proliferation. Additionally, the inhibition of COX-enzymes associated with PGE-2 inhibition may lead to impaired osteoblast differentiation, essential for tendon-to-bone healing.
On top of that, NSAIDs are not always sufficiently effective, can have numerous contraindications, and are therefore not suitable in up to 25% of all patients. These controversies implicate the need for alternative pain therapy. Metamizole (dipyrone) is a non-opioid compound with strong analgesic, antipyretic, and spasmolytic effects. The analgesic efficacy of intravenous or intramuscular metamizole for pain relief after inpatient surgery is well described. Recently, we showed in a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial that the combination of paracetamol and metamizole is equally effective in the treatment of acute postoperative pain at home after ambulatory surgery compared to paracetamol and ibuprofen. Moreover, patient satisfaction was equal in both groups, as well as the reported side effects.
Multiple mechanisms are involved in the antinociceptive effects of metamizole. More particularly, the inhibition of COX-1 and -2 enzymes and the activation of the endocannabinoid and opioidergic system. This seems partly similar to the working mechanism of NSAIDs, suggesting a theoretical presumption that metamizole also harms tendon repair. However, metamizole is not classified as an NSAID and no detrimental effect of metamizole on tendon healing and no link between metamizole and the previously described mechanism has been reported in the literature. The most important advantage of metamizole compared with NSAIDs is its favorable gastro-intestinal and cardiovascular side effect profile. Therefore, replacing NSAIDs with metamizole in the standard approach in surgeries where NSAIDs are contraindicated such as shoulder arthroscopies with tendon repair may increase the overall suitability of postoperative pain therapy.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: