Evaluation of the Added Value of Metamizole to Standard Post-operative Treatment After Ambulant Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Evaluation of the Added Value of Metamizole to Standard Post-operative Treatment After Ambulant Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
The aim of this study is to investigate if the addition of metamizole to the standard post-operative treatment, i.e. paracetamol and ibuprofen, is superior in reducing post-operative pain on day 1 after ambulatory surgery compared to the standard post-operative treatment.
Therefore, a mono-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled superiority trail will be designed in order to investigate superiority of metamizole compared to the standard post-operative treatment in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Ambulant surgery has been expanding substantially in the past decade, primarily because it is associated with lower costs and it is believed to be as safe as surgery in the in-patient setting. Moreover, it seems that early discharge can contribute to a faster recovery and a decreased incidence of hospital-associated complications. In view of the relative absence of major complications, post-operative pain and quality of recovery should be considered the principal endpoints after day surgery. The quality of recovery after different types of surgery is of major importance since the evaluation of recovery allows a discrimination between a normal and pathological health trajectory. A disadvantage in the ambulatory setting is related to the absence of postoperative surveillance by professionals. This implicates that the individual patient has to assess, without any support, if his/her quality of recovery is normal or not. There is limited information on procedure-specific quality of recovery after day surgery, however, different tools such as the 1-tem Global Surgical Recovery (GSR) index and the 5-dimensional European Quality of Life (EQ5D) questionnaires can be addressed.
Particularly in the ambulant setting, good post-operative analgesia is challenging because patients have to control pain at home by themselves, in the absence of hospital staff. Moreover, there is a limit in the type of analgesia that is available (i.e. no strong opioids) as well as in the route of administration (i.e. no epidural, intravenous, subcutaneous or intramuscular route) at home. Nowadays a multimodal approach to control pain has been advocated in the ambulatory setting. This approach is based on a combination of paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and, if necessary, weak opioids. A local and regional anesthesia also have been advocated in the ambulatory setting to relieve pain for 8 to 24 hours after surgery. Despite this multimodal pain therapy, the prevalence of outpatients suffering moderate to severe acute postoperative pain at home still remains high and varies from 9 to 40%. More specific, patients undergoing haemorrhoid surgery, arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery, and inguinal hernia repair seem to be at highest risk to develop moderate to severe pain on the fourth postoperative day.
Due to this relatively high prevalence and due to the fact that NSAIDs are not always sufficiently effective, can have numerous contraindications and therefore are not suitable in up to 25% of all patients; there is a need for an alternative pain therapy.
Metamizole (dipyrone) is a non-opioid compound with strong analgesic, antipyretic and spasmolytic effects. The analgesic efficacy of intravenous or intramuscular metamizole for pain relief after inpatient surgery is well described. Recently, we showed in a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial that the combination of paracetamol and metamizole is equally effective in treatment of acute post-operative pain at home after ambulatory surgery compared to paracetamol and ibuprofen. Moreover, patient satisfaction was equal in both groups, as well as the reported side effects.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: