Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia. Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia. Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Short-term follow up after surgery of para-esophageal hernia comparing two different types of fundoplication
Laparoscopic para-esophageal hernia (PEH) repair has been established as a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic patients. Today, most surgeons agree that a fundoplication should be included in the hiatal reconstruction in order to reduce the risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and hernia recurrence. However, what type of wrap that should be recommend is yet to be determined.
One might argue that the overall durability and effectiveness of a partial fundoplication in the control of reflux might be less reliable than a total wrap, but on the contrary, the latter carries the risk of inducing a pseudoachalasia similar situation in PEH patients.
We therefore designed a double blind randomized clinical trial in which patients with symptomatic paraesophageal hernia to receive either a posterior partial (Toupet) or total (Nissen) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair.
Six months follow up with questionnaires, 24-hour pH monitoring and radiology after surgery of para-esophageal hernia with addition of total fundoplication vs posterial partial fundoplication.
Dysphagia Scores; Ogilvie dysphagia score and Watson dysphagia score. Quality of Life; SF-36: physical and mental component scores.
Time points: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: