Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary treatment for patients determined to have severe aortic or mitral regurgitation is surgical repair or replacement their valves. The most commonly used tool to quantify the severity mitral and aortic regurgitation is echocardiography. Studies have shown that echocardiography may have significant limitations in quantifying regurgitant volume. MRI has recently been shown to easily and reproducibly quantify regurgitation. To better understand how to accurately quantify severity of regurgitation the investigators propose this study with the following aims: 1) compare MRI to echocardiography in the evaluation of regurgitant volume in patients with aortic or mitral regurgitation and 2) to assess which technique is better at predicting the response of the left ventricle to valve surgery.
The primary treatment for patients determined to have severe aortic or mitral regurgitation is surgical repair or replacement their valves. The most commonly used tool to quantify the severity mitral and aortic regurgitation is echocardiography. Studies have shown that echocardiography may have significant limitations in quantifying regurgitant volume. MRI has recently been shown to easily and reproducibly quantify regurgitation. To better understand how to accurately quantify severity of regurgitation the investigators propose this study with the following aims: 1) compare MRI to echocardiography in the evaluation of regurgitant volume in patients with aortic or mitral regurgitation and 2) to assess which technique is better at predicting the response of the left ventricle to valve surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitral/Aortic Regurgitation | Subjects identified with mitral or aortic regurgitation will be asked to undergo testing with trans thoracic echocardiogram, stress echocardiography, and cardiac MRI with and without contrast. In addition, patients will be asked to answer the KCC and EQ5DL questionnaires. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | Diagnostic Test | MRI of the heart |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation of echocardiography and MRI | Correlation of echocardiography and MRI | 6 month |
| Change in LV EDV post surgery | Change in LV EDV post surgery | 6 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects with mitral or aortic regurgitation
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morristown Medical Center | Recruiting | Morristown | New Jersey | 07960 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31005539 | Background | Uretsky S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Hiramatsu S, Argulian E, Rosenthal M, Gillam LD, Wolff SD. The Effect of Systolic Variation of Mitral Regurgitation on Discordance Between Noninvasive Imaging Modalities. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(12):2431-2442. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Apr 17. | |
| 29921479 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008944 | Mitral Valve Insufficiency |
| D001022 | Aortic Valve Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Uretsky S, Argulian E, Supariwala A, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Aldaia L, Chaudhry FA, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. A Comparative Assessment of Echocardiographic Parameters for Determining Primary Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Reference Standard. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Sep;31(9):992-999. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Jun 18. |
| 25790878 | Background | Uretsky S, Gillam L, Lang R, Chaudhry FA, Argulian E, Supariwala A, Gurram S, Jain K, Subero M, Jang JJ, Cohen R, Wolff SD. Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 24;65(11):1078-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.047. |
| 40392571 | Derived | Uretsky S, Gillam LD, Biederman RWW, Han Y, Jacob R, Martin ET, Langer M, Choi AD, Sultan I, Cavalcante JL, Shah DJ, Tong MS, Wolff SD, Sakul S, Guglielmo M, Pontone G. Sex differences in pre- and post-surgical left ventricular remodelling and outcomes in primary mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jul 31;26(8):1429-1437. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf151. |
| 35324429 | Derived | Uretsky S, Animashaun IB, Sakul S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Argulian E, Rosenthal M, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. American Society of Echocardiography Algorithm for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 May;15(5):747-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.006. Epub 2022 Jan 12. |
| 34915984 | Derived | Uretsky S, Morales DCV, Aldaia L, Mediratta A, Koulogiannis K, Marcoff L, Sakul S, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. Characterization of Primary Mitral Regurgitation With Flail Leaflet and/or Wall-Impinging Flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Dec 21;78(25):2537-2546. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1382. |
| 32408828 | Derived | Uretsky S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Argulian E, Lasam G, Gillam L. Concordance and Discordance of Echocardiographic Parameters Recommended for Assessing the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May;13(5):e010278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010278. Epub 2020 May 15. |