Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparison of two types of robot (Armeo power vs Armeo spring) for upper extremity rehabilitation on upper extremity function
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of robot. The robot used in this experiment was Armeo power and Armeo spring. Armeo power could provide assistive force via motor, on the other hand, Armeo spring could not provide any assist.
Thus the results from this study might suggest usefulness of motorized robot.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armeo power | Experimental | Armeo power robot for upper extremity |
|
| Armeo spring | Experimental | Armeo spring robot for upper extremity |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armeo power | Device | Intervention with Armeo power rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which provide assistive force. The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Wolf motor function test | Change of Wolf motor function test | change from baseline at 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment | Fugl-Meyer Assessment | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Stroke impact scale | Stroke impact scale (Health-related quality of life measurements in stroke patients) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joon-Ho Shin, MS | Contact | 82-2-901-1884 | asfreelyas@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joon-Ho Shin, MS | National Rehabilitation Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Rehabilitation Center | Recruiting | Seoul | 142884 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33076952 | Derived | Park JH, Park G, Kim HY, Lee JY, Ham Y, Hwang D, Kwon S, Shin JH. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 19;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Outcome assessor does not know the allocation of participants.
| Armeo spring | Device | Intervention with Armeo spring rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which is operated only by participants, without any assistive force from robot. The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day. |
|
| baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Motor activity log | Motor activity log | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Mean velocity of upper extremity during reaching task | Curvature of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity)during reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Curvature of upper extremity during reaching task | Curvature of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Jerk of upper extremity during reaching task | Jerk of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| % maximal voluntary contraction of upper extremity muscles during reaching task | surface EMG of upper extremity during reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Behavioral activation system/behavioral inhibition system scale | Behavioral activation system subscale, behavioral inhibition system subscale | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Beck depression index | Beck depression index | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Intrinsic motivation inventory | Intrinsic motivation inventory | baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| Stroke rehabilitation motivation scale | Stroke rehabilitation motivation scale | baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |