Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Clearance of Non-Complex Biliary Stones Using Fluoroscopy/Radiation-Free Direct Solitary Cholangioscopy (DSC) to Standard of Care Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC)
Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Clearance of Non-Complex Biliary Stones Using Fluoroscopy/Radiation-Free Direct Solitary Cholangioscopy (DSC) to Standard of Care Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC)
To prospectively compare non-complex biliary stone clearance using fluoroscopy/radiation-free direct solitary cholangioscopy (DSC) utilizing the SpyGlass™ system with non-complex biliary stone clearance using standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC).
The objective of this study is to prospectively compare non-complex biliary stone clearance using fluoroscopy/radiation-free direct solitary cholangioscopy (DSC) utilizing the SpyGlass™ system with non-complex biliary stone clearance using standard endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy (ERC).
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years or older
Abdominal pain consistent with choledocholithiasis (procedure possible within 72 hours of onset of symptoms and imaging suggesting choledocholithiasis, contingent on persistent abdominal pain)
Abnormal LFTs
Non-complex biliary stone disease, defined as 5 or fewer stones in the common bile or common hepatic duct with largest stone no larger than 10 mm in size. If stones not seen on imaging (US, CT) the bile duct diameter should be ≤12 mm*
* Given the poor sensitivity (approximately 20%) for biliary stones of CT and US, the diameter of the dilated CBD is used as a surrogate for largest stone diameter
Availability of non-invasive imaging to determine the diameter of the bile duct and number and size of bile duct stones if visible on imaging
Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Houston, Texas 77030, United States