Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The ultimate goal of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of periodontal tissues which have been destroyed due to periodontal disease. Different modalities have been proposed to obtain regeneration of periodontal tissues employing various bone grafts, bone substitute materials, guided tissue regeneration (GTR), combination of bone grafts or bone substitutes with GTR, and growth factors.
So, a new, fully synthetic, nanocrystalline, unsintered, phase-pure hydroxyapatite (nano-HA) has been suggested as a potential material for enhancing periodontal and bone regeneration since its chemical composition and crystalline structure correspond to the calcium phosphate component of natural bone and may have greater potential for resorption compared with sintered hydroxyapatite.
A study performed in 2012, on 14 patients with paired intrabony periodontal defects of ≥4 mm participated in split mouth design study. The defects in each subject were randomly selected to receive nano-HA paste in conjunction with papilla preservation flaps or papilla preservation flaps alone. Probing bone levels from a customized acrylic stent and probing pocket depths were measured at baseline and again 6 months following surgery. No differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed at baseline between the two groups. Healing was uneventful in all patients. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements between baseline and 6 months in all clinical and radio-graphic parameters. In conclusion, they found that the nano crystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft in combination with collagen membrane demonstrated clinical advantages beyond that achieved by open flap debridement alone.
The concept of porous guided tissue membrane has been tested recently as a modality that could stimulate bone formation of critical sized bone defects. Kim and co-workers claimed that asymmetrically porous GBR membranes with dual BMP-2 and ultrasound stimulation may be promising for the clinical treatment of delayed and insufficient bone healing. For guided tissue regeneration in periodontal therapy, membrane perforations could allow for gingival stem cells and periosteal cells to take part in supracrestal regeneration. The perforated section of the membranes would stabilize supracrestal fibrin clot through mechanical interlocking of fibrin strands with the membrane pores providing more membrane and clot stability. It has been suggested that regenerative failures may result when the tensile strength of the fibrin clot is exceeded, resulting in a tear and a long junctional epithelium type attachment.
The study will be conducted on 12 individuals. The research esthetics committee of Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University will review the proposal.
All patients will be informed about the nature of the study and will fine an informed consent.
I - Selection of the patients:
The patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of Oral Medicine and Periodontology department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University.
All the selected patients will be selected according to following criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
Patients free from any systemic diseases as evidenced by health using Burket's Oral Medicine health history questionnaire. (Glick, 2008)
Patients' age range from 25 to 50 years old.
Each patient should have at least two contralateral intrabony defects which fulfill the following criteria:
(i) Probing depth ≥ 5 mm. (ii) Clinical attachment loss ≥ 5 mm. (iii) Radiographic evidence of vertical bone loss using periapical radiographs.
Patients are should be willing to participate in the study and should be able to return for the follow up visits.
Exclusion criteria:
II- Study groups:
The selected sites will be randomly "double blinded study" divided into two groups in a split mouth design.
Group One:
The defects will be treated with open flap debridment followed by the placement of nanohydroxyapetite* combined with perforated collagen membrane**.
Group Two:
The defects will be treated with open flap debridment followed by the placement of nanohydroxyapetite combined with non perforated collagen membrane.
The mucoperiosteal flaps will be adapted and sutured and the patients will be given post-surgical instructions.
III- Periodontal evaluation:
Clinical Parameters:
The clinical parameters will be measured at one, three and six months postoperatively.
1) Plaque index (PI): Criteria of plaque index (PI) of (Silness and Loe, 1969) 0: No plaque in gingival area.
2) Gingival index (GI): Criteria of the gingival index (GI) of (Loe, 1967) 0: Normal gingiva
3) Probing pocket depth (PPD) : Probing pocket depth (PPD) will be measured from the gingival margin to the base of periodontal pocket to the nearest mm (Caton, 1989).
Six readings will be recorded for each tooth: Mesiobuccal, mid-buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, mid-lingual and distolingual.
4) Clinical attachment level (CAL): Clinical attachment level will be measured from cementoenamel junction to the base of pocket to the nearest mm.
B- Radiographic parameters
Periapical radiographs and Cone beam computed tomography will be taken at base line and at six months after the placement of barrier membranes combined with nanohydroxyapatite and the following parameters will be measured:
The sites will be measured first on periapical radiographs and later on CBCT with the help of the ruler in the Image Tool software (University of Texas Health Science Centre, San Antonio, TX) based on the method proposed by Misch et al.
Three measurements will be performed for each site:
The axial slices will be used to verify the presence of combined bone defects and identify according to the classification of Goldman and Cohen.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open flap debridement & perforated&Nano | Experimental | Perforated collagen membrane and nano-hydroxyapatite and open flap debridement |
|
| Open flap debridment &Occlusive&Nano | Active Comparator | Occlusive membrane and nano-hydroxyapatite and open flap debridement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open flap debridment | Procedure | Full mucoperiosteal flap reflected+ Debridement of infrabony defect |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CAL | Clinical attachment level | Change from base line to 3 months and 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| DOD | Depth of Defect (From cemento enamel junction to defect base) | Change from base line to 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients free from any systemic diseases as evidenced by health using Burket's Oral Medicine health history questionnaire. (Glick, 2008)
Patients' age range from 25 to 50 years old.
Each patient should have at least two contralateral intrabony defects which fulfill the following criteria: ** Probing depth ≥ 5 mm.
Patients are should be willing to participate in the study and should be able to return for the follow up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010520 | Aggressive Periodontitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010518 | Periodontitis |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Perforated collagen membrane | Other | Membrane perforations using dental needle |
|
| Occlusive membrane | Other | Biotech collagen membrane |
|
| Nanohydroxyapetite | Other | Nanbone Particles |
|