Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparing amount of horizontal bone gain 4 months after alveolar ridge augmentation using IPRF Nano- micro Sticky Bone with perforated collagen membrane versus occlusive barrier membrane by :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perforated collagen membrane | Experimental |
| |
| Occlusive collagen membrane | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perforated collagen membrane | Procedure | Horizontal Bone Augmentation using Perforated Collagen Membrane |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal alveolar bone width in mm | Measured By Bone caliber and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) | 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
5-Remaining alveolar bone ≥ 8mm vertically and ≤ 4 mm horizontally. 6-Gingival biotype 1-2mm thickness.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Occlusive collagen membrane | Procedure | Occlusive collagen membrane |
|