Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Ghent | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Nowadays there is a growing interest towards non-invasive assessment of urinary dysfunctions in clinical practice. The tendency to use uroflowmetry as a first-line screening tool is based on the inexpensiveness, time efficiency, comfort of the patient, etc. However, it is stated that uroflowmetry as a stand-alone study lacks the potential to make an accurate diagnosis. In regard to this, the International Continence Society indicated that the addition of pelvic floor electromyography might increase the accuracy of this assessment. Despite this recommendation, uroflowmetry in combination with electromyography has not been conducted in a healthy population.
The initial objective of this study was to examine whether adding electromyography to standard uroflowmetry in a healthy paediatric population would change the representation of parameters, especially of voiding patterns. In addition, the influence of several factors on uroflow parameters was analysed to complement current literature.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate uroflow/EMG testing | Participants performed two direct repetitions of uroflowmetry in combination with EMG. |
| |
| uroflow measurement beforehand | Participants performed a preceding measurement of isolated uroflowmetry, followed by two randomized measurements of either isolated uroflowmetry or uroflowmetry with EMG. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uroflow | Diagnostic Test | Isolated uroflow measurement |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Uroflow curve pattern - Clinical assessment | Interpretation by pediatric urologist | 2017 |
| Uroflow curve pattern - Mathematical assessment | Interpretation using Flow index methodology | 2017 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal flow | Qmax (millilitres/seconds) | 2017 |
| post-void residual urine | millilitres | 2017 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Normal development
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
continent children with normal development: community sample
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital | Ghent | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059411 | Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020924 | Urological Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Uroflow/EMG |
| Diagnostic Test |
Uroflow measurement with superficial EMG testing of the pelvic floor |
|
| US | Diagnostic Test | Ultrasound of post void residual urine |
|
| voiding time | seconds | 2017 |
| voided volume | millilitres | 2017 |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |