Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, multi-center, bilateral, double-masked, randomized, cross-over, daily wear, 1 month dispensing study (2 weeks each lens pair)
The aim of this study is to determine the clinical performance of fanfilcon A in comparison to senofilcon A sphere contact lenses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| fanfilcon A | Active Comparator | Participants are randomized to wear fanfilcon A for two weeks during the cross over study. |
|
| senofilcon A | Active Comparator | Participants are randomized to wear senofilcon A for two weeks during the cross over study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fanfilcon A | Device | contact lens |
| |
| senofilcon A |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Comfort | Subjective assessment for comfort is assessed. Scale 0-10, 0=painful, 10=can't feel | 2 weeks |
| Overall Dryness | Subjective ratings for dryness is assessed on a scale of 0-10, 0=extremely dry, 10=no dryness | 2 weeks |
| Vision Quality | Subjective ratings of vision quality is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=not sharp/not clear, 10=sharp/clear | 2 weeks |
| Lens Handling | Subjective ratings of lens handling - insertion and removal - is assessed using scale 0-10, 0=difficult to handle, 10=very easy to handle | 2 weeks |
| Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings of vision satisfaction is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=completely dissatisfied, 10=completely satisfied. | 2 weeks |
| Lens Centration | Lens centration will be recorded by degree and direction in the primary position. (Optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable). | 2 weeks |
| Conjunctival Staining | Assessed using slit lamp with blue light and sodium fluorescein, low medium magnification. 0=None, no staining present
| 2 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
Exclusion Criteria:
A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL (Contact Lens) wear (defined as 5 days per week; >8 hours/day)
Is currently wearing senofilcon C (2 weeks lens), senofilcon A 1-Day, senofilcon C (monthly lens) or enfilcon A contact lenses
Is habitually using rewetting/ lubricating eye drops more than once per day
Presents with clinically significant anterior segment abnormalities
Presents with ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear
Presents with slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea
Has presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses
Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lyndon Jones, PhD, FAAO | Centre for Contact Lens Research | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric M. White O. D., Inc | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States | ||
| Golden Vision |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Fanfilcon A First Then Senofilcon A | Participants are randomized to wear fanfilcon A for two weeks then senofilcon A |
| FG001 | Senofilcon A First Then Fanfilcon A | Participants are randomized to wear senofilcon A for two weeks then fanfilcon A |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lens 1 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Lens 2 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Fanfilcon A First Then Senofilcon A | Participants are randomized to wear fanfilcon A for two weeks then senofilcon A |
| BG001 | Senofilcon A First Then Fanfilcon A | Participants are randomized to wear senofilcon A for two weeks then fanfilcon A |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Comfort | Subjective assessment for comfort is assessed. Scale 0-10, 0=painful, 10=can't feel | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
Adverse event data was collected over the 2 week period for each lens
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Fanfilcon A | Participants are randomized to wear fanfilcon A either first or second for two weeks during the cross over study |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Vega, O.D., MSc., FAAO | CooperVision | 925-621-3761 | JVega2@coopervision.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009216 | Myopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
contact lens |
|
| Smoothness |
Subjective ratings for lens sensation of smoothness is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=not smooth at all, 10=totally smooth |
| 2 weeks |
| Clean Feeling | Subjective ratings for lens clean feeling is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=not clean at all, 10=lenses feel perfectly clean | 2 weeks |
| Lens Hydrated | Subjective ratings for lens sensation is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=totally dehydrated, 10=totally hydrated | 2 weeks |
| Lens Wettability | Subjective ratings for lens wettability is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=non-wettable, 10=highly wettable | 2 weeks |
| Sarasota |
| Florida |
| 34232 |
| United States |
| Kannarr Eye Care | Pittsburg | Kansas | 66762 | United States |
| Nittany Eye Associates | State College | Pennsylvania | 16801 | United States |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Overall Dryness | Subjective ratings for dryness is assessed on a scale of 0-10, 0=extremely dry, 10=no dryness | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision Quality | Subjective ratings of vision quality is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=not sharp/not clear, 10=sharp/clear | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Lens Handling | Subjective ratings of lens handling - insertion and removal - is assessed using scale 0-10, 0=difficult to handle, 10=very easy to handle | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings of vision satisfaction is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=completely dissatisfied, 10=completely satisfied. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Lens Centration | Lens centration will be recorded by degree and direction in the primary position. (Optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Conjunctival Staining | Assessed using slit lamp with blue light and sodium fluorescein, low medium magnification. 0=None, no staining present
| Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Smoothness | Subjective ratings for lens sensation of smoothness is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=not smooth at all, 10=totally smooth | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Clean Feeling | Subjective ratings for lens clean feeling is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=not clean at all, 10=lenses feel perfectly clean | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Lens Hydrated | Subjective ratings for lens sensation is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=totally dehydrated, 10=totally hydrated | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Lens Wettability | Subjective ratings for lens wettability is assessed on a scale 0-10, 0=non-wettable, 10=highly wettable | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 63 |
| 0 |
| 63 |
| 0 |
| 63 |
| EG001 | Senofilcon A | Participants are randomized to wear senofilcon A either first or second for two weeks during the cross over study | 0 | 63 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 63 |
Disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor should be notified of any use of study data for results communication.
| Unacceptable |
|